From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757765AbcBIQI7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:08:59 -0500
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:63131 "EHLO
	mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757730AbcBIQIz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:08:55 -0500
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 9
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 17:08:44 +0100
Message-ID: <3600593.0vxxUHHYns@wuerfel>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20160209160117.GB9332@leverpostej>
References: <20160209164104.4ecaa0ce@canb.auug.org.au> <3561538.HMPaSbaoce@wuerfel> <20160209160117.GB9332@leverpostej>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+U8QXomfqfHkIzJtqloynqGOBhF7nkNWFGEjGrTKr+AYqbu5Syt
 w8LRL2bgjcHIrYhCcKSa0mPKCJY82OUbhVQtFmbsjbUVBRzLU3/sWrmSub5UAUqqIsdI7c7
 nE44ticaXWP2QzTHaOcneasHo13/UXCV/tuXbUuBrXe24RJ0AUKa50f0vbZOSV4j9PxtBrt
 bkoo5ZjCriqfJ+O0AKnUA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:MQVixoHKmkw=:ZJWsA/hyAzZlX5HfK6OxQ7
 f4XjjseoF/p1eKCD61is5wdypUi9LY6TlAl8SsZ/82pq7vXVUXve7/sqk1S1Jpk+dEXzwkpoh
 WYNFRCN9Q+aMwkyviHRZTLdID5DmUnmwCsnzw5Tu+F2dr0WcUIOFUMRoQ3Knka6tp/YMfRUeu
 71wLtZG1vdXYLKmNd8a12mH752ROgvIquqyRqFUwE+L5bqviZqAHmogp7oWZyodtTohRMUPJ4
 PfzUa6Y+gG8YpUZYsi2Zyss2XYIq6z00xb7+8FI7TXu9GPx1WYd/tik/pklypU1D0cX6tdXCd
 AQZV4jquWL5MDd0BkYlSGlt4NK08yK3etgp0oB+Q32D7nH6lG4189i8Lto8iifXPqPynDB5Bw
 dDWRrs8Wi6gHRzF9cpnee/y09h/JKQKJ/F5TX6Y8MOtwqoGHSd7/9MSsyHvCP3XJgPpQuRaAe
 jgIgFQkEUnFGLYrfSqzzcRrZP7pMwiIdbe6WceqmYBpCJi1ydrCXTk9elo8bCCpgJrCGco9+8
 FzXi89sjB4/8xB5BmgX9gZ+mo7mAmo2DlWhScWOuEXpzJVNMKDLw/VRmgv2mE2yaKdIXN6XJu
 zY5ZZZQWdQOkqF9hoA7zCJo42DCc0eqMJT9+Z5AUwhhgLGdyaO+oz0v9HzAKm8jM5LOKgD6vY
 hIZOU+ITngF0yuGy2l8oC4cNPYoTZtMpWFpz4/3s2hW0z6ljzPj25CmzeOuynoHL0keuUHd8s
 ODFoJkVfEf2Yvu7r
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday 09 February 2016 16:01:18 Mark Rutland wrote:
> That builds fine for me atop of for-next/pgtable, both 64-bit and
> 32-bit.
> 
> GCC seems to treat enum fixed_addresses the same as unsigned. Only if I
> change the type of idx in fixmap.h (e.g. to char) do I get a conflict
> against paravirt.h

Interesting.


The patch seems fine then:

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>