From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yuchao0@huawei.com (Chao Yu) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:42:36 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] staging: erofs: option validation for remount and some code cleanups In-Reply-To: References: <20180919145346.9927-1-cgxu519@gmx.com> <97e148db-1ab9-a76f-414e-bbeaa1a24eda@aol.com> Message-ID: <36255aa8-8654-891a-ee89-204760edba23@huawei.com> On 2018/9/20 7:34, cgxu519 wrote: > On 9/19/18 11:22 PM, Gao Xiang wrote: >> Hi Chengguang, >> >> On 2018/9/19 22:53, Chengguang Xu wrote: >>> Hi Greg, Xiang >>> >>> I rebased code on latest erofs-master branch and that branch >>> has already merged the first patch in my previous patchset, >>> so this time I only post rest 3 patches. >> Great, at the most time Chao's erofs-master is the same as Greg's >> staging tree (currently it is), but I personally think all patches >> could be better directly based on the final staging tree if these >> patches has no real/effective dependency with some submitted patches >> but haven't been applied by Greg (p.s. it should be avoided as >> much as possible because community guys could find something >> important like the yesterday patches). >> >> Once again, the detail information of branches is described in >> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linux-erofs/ Yeah, I can confirm that's all true. :) >> >> I have nothing more to say, good luck :) >> > Thanks for the guide! > > Chengguang > > . >