From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] librte_ether: add API for VF management Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 16:30:05 +0200 Message-ID: <3631809.sFy4WKcCTS@xps13> References: <1474453204-31516-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1475158591-2243-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, rahul.r.shah@intel.com, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, az5157@att.com, azelezniak To: Bernard Iremonger Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA46538EB for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 16:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w84so301817055wmg.1 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:30:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1475158591-2243-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-09-29 15:16, Bernard Iremonger: > Add new API function to configure and manage VF's on a NIC. > > add rte_eth_dev_set_vf_vlan_stripq function. > > Signed-off-by: azelezniak We need the full name of azelezniak. > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger [...] > +int > +rte_eth_dev_set_vf_vlan_stripq(uint8_t port, uint16_t vf, int on); Why keeping this function in ethdev? I think it would be more consistent to have also existing VF functions moving from ethdev to rte_pmd_ixgbe.h. You cannot remove them, but you can create their ixgbe-specific version and announce that the ethdev ones are deprecated.