From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Pouiller Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 10:13:56 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Proposal to remove patches from patchwork, or find adopters In-Reply-To: <20150506235353.7740a9d3@free-electrons.com> References: <20150506235353.7740a9d3@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <3636354.fxv6q18u86@sagittea> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Wednesday 06 May 2015 23:53:53 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: [...] > Volunteers interested in adopting one or several of the below patches, > please speak up. > > Here is the list of such patches: > [...] > * [1/2] Use package framework to manage skeleton > * [2/2] Change deps between $(TARGET_DIRS) and rootfs-dirs IMHO, they continue to make sense. I will respin and resend. [...] > * [RFC,3/4] opengl-registry: Also provide DRI interface > * [RFC,4/4] xorg-server: Depends on libgl to enable DRI/GLX These 2 ones was based on opengl-registry. This package was replaced by mesa3d-headers. However, I think there is something to do on this subject. I mark the first as Not-Applicable and the second as Change Request. I will rework them. [...] -- J?r?me Pouiller, Sysmic Embedded Linux specialist http://www.sysmic.fr