From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.121] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZgG8-0005Vz-7d for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:54:48 +0000 Received: from mail-pz0-f179.google.com ([209.85.222.179]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1NZgG7-00077K-93 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:54:48 +0000 Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9so1792723pzk.28 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:54:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B5E8192.80909@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4B5E8192.80909@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:54:38 -0800 Message-ID: <364299f41001252354m16d21845h6c1bd0b53cd5c98@mail.gmail.com> From: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Shi Weihua Cc: ltp-list On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua wrote: > Hi, Cooper > > I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined > sa_sigaction in struct sigaction. > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/r= t_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=3D1.6&r2=3D1.7 > > As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64. > ------------ > Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in str= uct sigaction). > ------------ > But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64. > > On my x86_64, signal.h like this: > ------------ > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > #ifdef __i386__ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(sa_sigaction defined here) =A0<-- > #else /* __i386__ */ > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(no sa_sigaction defined) =A0 =A0<-- > #endif /* !__i386__ */ > > #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ > ------------ > your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in > LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation. Shi, I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken). Thanks, -Garrett ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the busine= ss Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list