From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.122] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NZoWP-0002es-V0 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:44:09 +0000 Received: from mail-pz0-f179.google.com ([209.85.222.179]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1NZoWO-0000f5-JU for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:44:09 +0000 Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9so2058020pzk.28 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:44:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B5EB72B.7010909@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4B5E8192.80909@cn.fujitsu.com> <364299f41001252354m16d21845h6c1bd0b53cd5c98@mail.gmail.com> <364299f41001260025v527adde4u44ff82c647d18b4e@mail.gmail.com> <4B5EB72B.7010909@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:43:59 -0800 Message-ID: <364299f41001260843y72e9ac28nbe2cabee41b2055c@mail.gmail.com> From: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: [LTP] [PROBLEM?] rt_sigaction01 still failed on x86_64 List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Shi Weihua Cc: ltp-list On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Shi Weihua wrote: > at 2010-1-26 16:25, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper wr= ote: >>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Shi Weihua wrot= e: >>>> Hi, Cooper >>>> >>>> I noticed that you added a check of platform which not defined >>>> sa_sigaction in struct sigaction. >>>> http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscall= s/rt_sigaction/rt_sigaction01.c?r1=3D1.6&r2=3D1.7 >>>> >>>> As your expectted, the following message will output on x86_64. >>>> ------------ >>>> Your architecture doesn't support this test (no sa_sigaction field in = struct sigaction). >>>> ------------ >>>> But unfortunately, it still failed on my x86_64. >>>> >>>> On my x86_64, signal.h like this: >>>> ------------ >>>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ >>>> >>>> #ifdef __i386__ >>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(sa_sigaction defined here) =A0<-- >>>> #else /* __i386__ */ >>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(no sa_sigaction defined) =A0 =A0<-- >>>> #endif /* !__i386__ */ >>>> >>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ >>>> ------------ >>>> your check still work ? Sorry, I don't know the check process in >>>> LTP configure clearly. Could you give me some explanation. >>> >>> Shi, >>> =A0 =A0I'm just going to test out the other proposed rt_sigaction, and >>> revert this change if it doesn't work back to a semi-functioning state >>> (which means that x86_64 will once again be broken). >> >> =A0 =A0 Files reverted because liubo's patch didn't stick. > > Do you will pick out some useful code from liubo's patch ? > Previously, you said you would do that. (2009-12-22) ;-) Yes, I did; I tried to apply the patch, almost all of the hunks failed to apply. Liubo, Please generate a new patch and attach it someone can apply it and test. Thanks, -Garrett ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the busine= ss Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list