From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: bug in tag handling in blk-mq? To: Mike Galbraith , Paolo Valente Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-block , Ulf Hansson , LKML , Linus Walleij , Oleksandr Natalenko References: <999DF2B3-4EE8-4BDF-89C5-EB0C2D8BF69E@linaro.org> <7760d23b-7a4c-a645-1c7a-da7569bb44dc@kernel.dk> <84145CD7-B917-4B32-8A5C-310C1910DB71@linaro.org> <1525755090.24338.1.camel@gmx.de> <1525768632.5208.4.camel@gmx.de> <1525797766.5204.2.camel@gmx.de> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <3692ce7d-a767-72e6-65ae-6178b6c2e7d8@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 14:37:52 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1525797766.5204.2.camel@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 List-ID: On 5/8/18 10:42 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 08:55 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> >> All the block debug files are empty... > > Sigh. Take 2, this time cat debug files, having turned block tracing > off before doing anything else (so trace bits in dmesg.txt should end > AT the stall). OK, that's better. What I see from the traces: - You have regular IO and some non-fs IO (from scsi_execute()). This mix may be key. - sdd has nothing pending, yet has 6 active waitqueues. I'm going to see if I can reproduce this. Paolo, what kind of attempts to reproduce this have you done? -- Jens Axboe