From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262224AbULQXK2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:10:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262225AbULQXK2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:10:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:9886 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262224AbULQXKX (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:10:23 -0500 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20041217154018.C21393@almesberger.net> References: <20041217154018.C21393@almesberger.net> <20041217153602.D31842@almesberger.net> To: Werner Almesberger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rajesh Venkatasubramanian , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] prio_tree: move general code from mm/ to lib/ X-Mailer: MH-E 7.82; nmh 1.0.4; GNU Emacs 21.3.50.3 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:10:15 +0000 Message-ID: <3700.1103325015@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Werner Almesberger wrote: > > Note that this patch conflicts with a patch in 2.6.10-rc3-mm1 > (frv-better-mmap-support-in-uclinux.patch), which removes > mm/prio_tree in systems without an MMU. Not making that other > patch provide a dummy for prio_tree_init should resolve the > conflict. (That's just from reading the patch - I haven't > actually tried this.) The prio_tree stuff can go back in for the nommu stuff. I've given Andrew a patch to that effect (copied to LKML). Subject: [PATCH] Cross-reference nommu VMAs with mappings Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:55:35 +0000 David