From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6477DC433E0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:22:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41AFC23A01 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:22:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 41AFC23A01 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jprrQ-00047B-3j; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:22:04 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jprrO-000474-Uy for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:22:02 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: c0f657be-b9fa-11ea-b7bb-bc764e2007e4 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id c0f657be-b9fa-11ea-b7bb-bc764e2007e4; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:22:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4CAAD5D; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 for-4.14 2/2] pvcalls: Document correctly and explicitely the padding for all arches To: Julien Grall References: <20200627095533.14145-1-julien@xen.org> <20200627095533.14145-3-julien@xen.org> <9fc81bbe-6c30-e848-ceae-1356ec30a8f8@suse.com> <11dad2fc-b1ec-3279-1a99-920a5f67456a@xen.org> From: Jan Beulich Message-ID: <37362d94-053d-5eb9-d2fa-9d30690313f0@suse.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 13:22:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <11dad2fc-b1ec-3279-1a99-920a5f67456a@xen.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , paul@xen.org, Andrew Cooper , Julien Grall , Ian Jackson , George Dunlap , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On 29.06.2020 12:03, Julien Grall wrote: > On 29/06/2020 09:28, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 27.06.2020 11:55, Julien Grall wrote: >>> As an aside, the padding sadly cannot be mandated to be 0 as they are >>> already present. So it is not going to be possible to use the padding >>> for extending a command in the future. >> >> Why is the other adjustment fine to make due to still being tech >> preview, but this one wouldn't be for the same reason? > > This is mostly a left-over of the previous message. Although, I am not > really inclined to address this myself any time soon. Sure, I didn't mean to indicate I might expect you to. But perhaps here the wording could be slightly changed as well? Jan