From: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@wdc.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme/fc: Short-circuit reconnect retries
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:48:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <373a627a-2c14-32c8-935b-6aa60ba22272@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4348b2a1-0861-0020-e873-0680812c4849@grimberg.me>
On 5/21/2021 1:17 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>> if (recon && nvmf_should_reconnect(&ctrl->ctrl)) {
>> @@ -3286,12 +3290,17 @@ nvme_fc_reconnect_or_delete(struct
>> nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl, int status)
>> queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->connect_work, recon_delay);
>> } else {
>> - if (portptr->port_state == FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE)
>> - dev_warn(ctrl->ctrl.device,
>> - "NVME-FC{%d}: Max reconnect attempts (%d) "
>> - "reached.\n",
>> - ctrl->cnum, ctrl->ctrl.nr_reconnects);
>> - else
>> + if (portptr->port_state == FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE) {
>> + if (status > 0 && (status & NVME_SC_DNR))
>> + dev_warn(ctrl->ctrl.device,
>> + "NVME-FC{%d}: reconnect failure\n",
>
> Maybe worth to print the status here?
>
> Otherwise looks good,
> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
>
Agree with Sagi that the print should have the status.
Reviewed-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
-- james
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 8:23 [PATCH] nvme/fc: Short-circuit reconnect retries Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-21 17:28 ` Himanshu Madhani
2021-05-21 20:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-05-21 20:48 ` James Smart [this message]
2021-05-22 9:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-25 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=373a627a-2c14-32c8-935b-6aa60ba22272@gmail.com \
--to=jsmart2021@gmail.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=keith.busch@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.