From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73915C6FD1F for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229774AbjCTCNg (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Mar 2023 22:13:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37758 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229782AbjCTCNe (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Mar 2023 22:13:34 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA77A193DF for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 19:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89D2E21ADD for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:13:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1679278411; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=t9K3bC8CYN2ESXZCLgMQ+pWFnD9it3SMz/fEQFezR8M=; b=mqVlEiDl38ellH7gPmcPxis4BWfffUUc14q0j85HNsLQ0oo9Zni6k7s525B6VLjd5sv1r8 GWDzEGgsnK9tp4miHRJTepi71dGGzSicdX4SHHw2eOqCh10+TVs4RAQGWL0mHYiqyuZaBw QIU32edfhkd+X6c470zMhnxsZxEAdzQ= Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8AC13416 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id IHGjEUrBF2QLPQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:13:30 +0000 From: Qu Wenruo To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 07/12] btrfs: scrub: introduce a helper to verify one scrub_stripe Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:12:53 +0800 Message-Id: <374cf04284f8f890f3df222d18b6dd271d478caa.1679278088.git.wqu@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org The new helper, scrub_verify_stripe(), shares the same main workflow of the old scrub code. The major differences are: - How pages/page_offset is grabbed Everything can be grabbed from scrub_stripe easily. - When error report happens Currently the helper only verify the sectors, not really doing any error reporting. The error reporting would be done after we have done the repair. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- fs/btrfs/scrub.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index f3445c7f5dc1..ed8b9a97f9dd 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -2174,7 +2174,7 @@ static unsigned int scrub_stripe_get_page_offset(struct scrub_stripe *stripe, return offset_in_page(sector_nr << fs_info->sectorsize_bits); } -void scrub_verify_one_metadata(struct scrub_stripe *stripe, int sector_nr) +static void scrub_verify_one_metadata(struct scrub_stripe *stripe, int sector_nr) { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = stripe->bg->fs_info; const unsigned int sectors_per_tree = fs_info->nodesize >> @@ -2273,6 +2273,84 @@ void scrub_verify_one_metadata(struct scrub_stripe *stripe, int sector_nr) bitmap_clear(&stripe->meta_error_bitmap, sector_nr, sectors_per_tree); } +static void scrub_verify_one_sector(struct scrub_stripe *stripe, + int sector_nr) +{ + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = stripe->bg->fs_info; + struct scrub_sector_verification *sector = &stripe->sectors[sector_nr]; + const unsigned int sectors_per_tree = fs_info->nodesize >> + fs_info->sectorsize_bits; + struct page *page = scrub_stripe_get_page(stripe, sector_nr); + unsigned int pgoff = scrub_stripe_get_page_offset(stripe, sector_nr); + u8 csum_buf[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE]; + int ret; + + ASSERT(sector_nr >= 0 && sector_nr < stripe->nr_sectors); + + /* Sector not utilized, skip it. */ + if (!test_bit(sector_nr, &stripe->extent_sector_bitmap)) + return; + + /* IO error, no need to check. */ + if (test_bit(sector_nr, &stripe->io_error_bitmap)) + return; + + /* Metadata, verify the full tree block. */ + if (sector->is_metadata) { + /* + * Check if the tree block crosses the stripe boudary. + * If crossed the boundary, we can not verify it but only + * gives a warning. + * + * This can only happen in very old fs where chunks are not + * ensured to be stripe aligned. + */ + if (unlikely(sector_nr + sectors_per_tree > stripe->nr_sectors)) { + btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info, + "tree block at %llu crosses stripe boundary %llu", + stripe->logical + + (sector_nr << fs_info->sectorsize_bits), + stripe->logical); + return; + } + scrub_verify_one_metadata(stripe, sector_nr); + return; + } + + /* + * Data is much easier, we just verify the data csum (if we have). + * For cases without csum, we have no other choice but to trust it. + */ + if (!sector->csum) { + clear_bit(sector_nr, &stripe->error_bitmap); + return; + } + + ret = btrfs_check_sector_csum(fs_info, page, pgoff, csum_buf, sector->csum); + if (ret < 0) { + set_bit(sector_nr, &stripe->csum_error_bitmap); + set_bit(sector_nr, &stripe->error_bitmap); + } else { + clear_bit(sector_nr, &stripe->csum_error_bitmap); + clear_bit(sector_nr, &stripe->error_bitmap); + } +} + +/* Verify specified sectors of a stripe. */ +void scrub_verify_one_stripe(struct scrub_stripe *stripe, unsigned long bitmap) +{ + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = stripe->bg->fs_info; + const unsigned int sectors_per_tree = fs_info->nodesize >> + fs_info->sectorsize_bits; + int sector_nr; + + for_each_set_bit(sector_nr, &bitmap, stripe->nr_sectors) { + scrub_verify_one_sector(stripe, sector_nr); + if (stripe->sectors[sector_nr].is_metadata) + sector_nr += sectors_per_tree - 1; + } +} + static int scrub_checksum_tree_block(struct scrub_block *sblock) { struct scrub_ctx *sctx = sblock->sctx; diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.h b/fs/btrfs/scrub.h index 0d8bdc7df89c..45ff7e149806 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.h @@ -24,6 +24,6 @@ int scrub_find_fill_first_stripe(struct btrfs_block_group *bg, struct btrfs_device *dev, u64 physical, int mirror_num, u64 logical_start, u32 logical_len, struct scrub_stripe *stripe); -void scrub_verify_one_metadata(struct scrub_stripe *stripe, int sector_nr); +void scrub_verify_one_stripe(struct scrub_stripe *stripe, unsigned long bitmap); #endif -- 2.39.2