From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54465) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjjHv-0001DA-8B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:23:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjjHe-0003GD-H1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:23:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjjHe-0002x3-6T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:22:58 -0500 References: <1547196148-12250-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <552ac2db-6568-18f8-5397-a00c4b432df9@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <37af0849-319b-9f38-547d-43b7032c045a@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 12:22:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <552ac2db-6568-18f8-5397-a00c4b432df9@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] HACKING vs. CODING_STYLE (was: Re: [PATCH] HACKING: Clarify the paragraph about typedefs) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Markus Armbruster , =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= , Greg Kurz , Eric Blake , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Stefan Hajnoczi On 16/01/19 11:58, Thomas Huth wrote: >> And, I would move it to CODING_STYLE since we are at it. :) > I just got some feedback in IRC already, and seems like I am not alone, > so let's discuss it here on the mailing list, too: What's the exact > difference between CODING_STYLE and HACKING? Some of the paragraphs in > HACKING sound rather mandatory and coding-style related, too... > Should we maybe merge the two files into one (e.g. called "CODING")? I think they should be merged, yes. It doesn't have to be done immediately though. Paolo