All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
	ying.huang@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	isaku.yamahata@intel.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com,
	bagasdotme@gmail.com, sagis@google.com, imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/18] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL infrastructure
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:39:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <37d5736e-93b1-aed1-c21c-07fe1044f2d0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd18d6b42768e0107d212fdebedae92cfd72cfe1.1676286526.git.kai.huang@intel.com>

On 2/13/23 03:59, Kai Huang wrote:
> SEAMCALL instruction causes #GP when TDX isn't BIOS enabled, and #UD
> when CPU is not in VMX operation.  The current TDX_MODULE_CALL macro
> doesn't handle any of them.  There's no way to check whether the CPU is
> in VMX operation or not.

Really?  ... *REALLY*?

Like, there's no possible way for the kernel to record whether it has
executed VMXON or not?

I think what you're saying here is that there's no architecturally
visible flag that tells you whether in spot #1 or #2 in the following code:

static int kvm_cpu_vmxon(u64 vmxon_pointer)
{
        u64 msr;

        cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_VMXE);
// spot #1
        asm_volatile_goto("1: vmxon %[vmxon_pointer]\n\t"
                          _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, %l[fault])
                          : : [vmxon_pointer] "m"(vmxon_pointer)
                          : : fault);
// spot #2

That's _maybe_ technically correct (I don't know enough about VMX
enabling to tell you).  But, what I *DO* know is that it's nonsense to
say that it's impossible in the *kernel* to tell whether we're on a CPU
that's successfully executed VMXON or not.

kvm_cpu_vmxon() has two paths through it:

  1. Successfully executes VMXON and leaves with X86_CR4_VMXE=1
  2. Fails VMXON and leaves with X86_CR4_VMXE=0

Guess what?  CR4 is rather architecturally visible.  From what I can
tell, it's *ENTIRELY* plausible to assume that X86_CR4_VMXE==1 means
that VMXON has been done.  Even if that's wrong, it's only a cpumask and
a cpumask_set() away from becoming plausible.  Like so:

static int kvm_cpu_vmxon(u64 vmxon_pointer)
{
        u64 msr;

        cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_VMXE);

        asm_volatile_goto("1: vmxon %[vmxon_pointer]\n\t"
                          _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, %l[fault])
                          : : [vmxon_pointer] "m"(vmxon_pointer)
                          : : fault);
	// set cpumask bit here
        return 0;

fault:
	// clear cpu bit here
        cr4_clear_bits(X86_CR4_VMXE);

        return -EFAULT;
}

How many design decisions down the line in this series were predicated
on the idea that:

	There's no way to check whether the CPU is
	in VMX operation or not.

?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-13 11:59 [PATCH v9 00/18] TDX host kernel support Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 01/18] x86/tdx: Define TDX supported page sizes as macros Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 02/18] x86/virt/tdx: Detect TDX during kernel boot Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 03/18] x86/virt/tdx: Make INTEL_TDX_HOST depend on X86_X2APIC Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 04/18] x86/virt/tdx: Add skeleton to initialize TDX on demand Kai Huang
2023-02-14 12:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-14 17:23     ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-14 21:08       ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 05/18] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL infrastructure Kai Huang
2023-02-13 17:48   ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-13 21:21     ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-13 22:39   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2023-02-13 23:22     ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-14  8:57       ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-14 17:27         ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-14 22:17           ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-14 12:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-14 21:02     ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 06/18] x86/virt/tdx: Do TDX module global initialization Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 07/18] x86/virt/tdx: Do TDX module per-cpu initialization Kai Huang
2023-02-13 17:59   ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-13 21:19     ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-13 22:43       ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-14  0:02         ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-14 14:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-14 22:53             ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-15  9:16               ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-15  9:46                 ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-15 13:25                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-15 21:37                     ` Huang, Kai
2023-03-06 14:26                       ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-13 18:07   ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-13 21:13     ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-13 22:28       ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-13 23:43         ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-13 23:52           ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-14  0:09             ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-14 14:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-14 12:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 08/18] x86/virt/tdx: Get information about TDX module and TDX-capable memory Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 09/18] x86/virt/tdx: Use all system memory when initializing TDX module as TDX memory Kai Huang
2023-02-14  3:30   ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-14  8:24     ` Huang, Kai
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 10/18] x86/virt/tdx: Add placeholder to construct TDMRs to cover all TDX memory regions Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 11/18] x86/virt/tdx: Fill out " Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 12/18] x86/virt/tdx: Allocate and set up PAMTs for TDMRs Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 13/18] x86/virt/tdx: Designate reserved areas for all TDMRs Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 14/18] x86/virt/tdx: Configure TDX module with the TDMRs and global KeyID Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 15/18] x86/virt/tdx: Configure global KeyID on all packages Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 16/18] x86/virt/tdx: Initialize all TDMRs Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 17/18] x86/virt/tdx: Flush cache in kexec() when TDX is enabled Kai Huang
2023-02-13 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 18/18] Documentation/x86: Add documentation for TDX host support Kai Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=37d5736e-93b1-aed1-c21c-07fe1044f2d0@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=sagis@google.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.