Yes, technically it would be the same. Thanks for the hint.

Vyacheslav

On 15.11.2021 21:56, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Can't we achieve the same by abstracting the common part into a 
> function and defining the two tests explicitly?
>
> Alex
>
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 21:26, Vyacheslav Yurkov <uvv.mail@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>     It's substituted further down into
>     def test_sbin_init(self, _, origInit):
>
>     parameterized.expand generates two tests out of it. The string
>     parameter is used as a suffix for the test, the rest is used as
>     input parameters, i.e. the first test would be called with
>     origInit=True, the second one with origInit=False.
>
>     The sample output looks like this:
>
>     2021-11-15 20:21:15,740 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS -
>     overlayfs.OverlayFSEtcRunTimeTests.test_sbin_init_0_original:
>     PASSED (295.73s)
>     2021-11-15 20:21:15,740 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS -
>     overlayfs.OverlayFSEtcRunTimeTests.test_sbin_init_1_preinit:
>     PASSED (177.97s)
>
>     Vyacheslav
>