From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932099Ab2JSRQy (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:16:54 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:3010 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754341Ab2JSRQx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:16:53 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,613,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="229790139" From: "Luck, Tony" To: Al Viro , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" CC: "linus-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Haavard Skinnemoen , Mike Frysinger , Jesper Nilsson , David Howells , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Hirokazu Takata , Geert Uytterhoeven , Michal Simek , Jonas Bonn , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Richard Kuo , Martin Schwidefsky , Lennox Wu , "David S. Miller" , Paul Mundt , Chris Zankel , Chris Metcalf , Yoshinori Sato , Guan Xuetao Subject: RE: new execve/kernel_thread design Thread-Topic: new execve/kernel_thread design Thread-Index: AQHNq+6Tvf4Kwo9jKkmvR03nZz0CIJfBP/+A//+ia5A= Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:16:50 +0000 Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F19D57A82@ORSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20121016223508.GR2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20121019154901.GK2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20121019154901.GK2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.138] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Surprisingly enough, ia64 one seems to work on actual hardware; I have sent > Tony an incremental patch cleaning copy_thread() up, waiting for results of > testing that on SMP box. Tiny bit faster than plain 3.7-rc1. lmbench3 reports fork+execve test at between 558 to 567 usec with the new code, compared with 562-572 usec with the old. -Tony