From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Pattan, Reshma" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1]:rte_timer:timer lag issue correction Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:27:45 +0000 Message-ID: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F01098625@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20160826132701.18428-1-skarmarkar@sonusnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" , "rsanford@akamai.com" To: Karmarkar Suyash Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7A52904 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:27:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, >=20 > For Periodic timers ,if the lag gets introduced, the current code added a= dditional > delay when the next peridoc timer was initialized by not taking into acco= unt the > delay added, with this fix the code would start the next occurrence of ti= mer > keeping in account the lag added.Corrected the behavior. >=20 > Fixes:rte_timer: timer lag issue Fixes line format is not corerct. Fixes line should contain commit hash th= at introduced the bug and its subject line. For your case below should be a= dded. Fixes: 9b15ba89 ("timer: use a skip list") Thanks, Reshma