On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:18 AM, Diego Sueiro <diego.sueiro@gmail.com> wrote:

Bryan,


On 28 January 2016 at 13:49, Bryan Evenson <bevenson@melinkcorp.com> wrote:

In my opinion, I think in the long term it would be easier to make a clean break.  Start with a recent branch, like Jethro, get a minimal image to build for your hardware and then add your own layer with your proprietary recipes.  I think that will be a lot easier than trying to get oe-core working with 5+ year old versions of gcc and eglibc.  Yes, that would mean additional testing, but it may be less testing/integration than you are currently doing just trying to keep your current image maintained.

 


Thanks for your opinion.

But unfortunately, updating the packages is out of scope in this moment since the product is certificated and doing this will require a new process.

I think you have to think about what you are getting into. You are trying to mix quite two different things are create third one. If I were you, I would just
keep myself synced with upstream as much as I could, Don’t look one way, you have to look into time and effort you will spend on maintaining this new
jargon for years to come. 


Maybe I can use the Arago External Pre-built Binary Toolchain (2011-09)[1] in which is supported by TI until daisy branch[2].


--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto