From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Adamson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/47] nfsd41: match clientid establishment method Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:10:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3BDF03B5-9772-49DA-82D9-5D2CF70CC501@netapp.com> References: <49CDDFC2.4070402@panasas.com> <1238229137-10764-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@panasas.com> <20090331030418.GC7653@fieldses.org> <49D1D901.5000706@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, pnfs@linux-nfs.org To: Benny Halevy Return-path: Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:50625 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757871AbZCaOLE (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:11:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49D1D901.5000706@panasas.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:49 AM, Benny Halevy wrote: > On Mar. 31, 2009, 6:04 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" > wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:32:17AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: >>> From: Andy Adamson >>> >>> We need to distinguish between client names provided by NFSv4.0 >>> clients >>> SETCLIENTID and those provided by NFSv4.1 via EXCHANGE_ID when >>> looking >>> up the clientid by string. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy >>> Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson >>> [nfsd41: use boolean values for use_exchange_id argument] >>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy >>> --- >>> fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c | 3 ++- >>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> +----------- >>> include/linux/nfsd/state.h | 2 +- >>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c >>> index b11cf8d..3444c00 100644 >>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c >>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c >>> @@ -344,7 +344,8 @@ purge_old(struct dentry *parent, struct dentry >>> *child) >>> { >>> int status; >>> >>> - if (nfs4_has_reclaimed_state(child->d_name.name)) >>> + /* note: we currently use this path only for minorversion 0 */ >> >> Why is that? > > Hmm, I'm not sure this is true anymore. > Andy, do you recall? I believe this was very early code intended to address the recovery of clientid's established via exchange_id which was never addressed. > > One thing for sure, we currently implemented nothing to > propagate the "use_exchange_id" state onto the state > recovery mechanisms, so this comment merely reflects > that, though it isn't clear what "this path" means > in this context, i.e. is this the path we were called > in, or the path we're calling. Since nfsd4_create_clid_dir is only called in nfsd4_clientid_confirm, we never store a clientid established by exchange_id in the recovery directory. > > At any rate, if this is something we need to fix for 4.1 > and it does not introduce any regression to 4.0, and if > the fix isn't trivial/simple, I suggest we add a FIXME comment, > and add it to our todo list to defer the solution post > this push effort. I agree. Update the above comment to a FIXME. -->Andy > > >> >>> + if (nfs4_has_reclaimed_state(child->d_name.name, false)) >>> return 0; >>> >>> status = nfsd4_clear_clid_dir(parent, child); >>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c >>> index 09c63ff..0c39376 100644 >>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c >>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c >>> @@ -723,25 +723,44 @@ find_unconfirmed_client(clientid_t *clid) >>> return NULL; >>> } >>> >>> +/* >>> + * Return 1 iff clp's clientid establishment method matches the >>> use_exchange_id >>> + * parameter. Matching is based on the fact the at least one of the >>> + * EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_{NON_PNFS,PNFS_MDS,PNFS_DS} flags must be >>> set for v4.1 >>> + */ >>> +static inline int >>> +match_clientid_establishment(struct nfs4_client *clp, bool >>> use_exchange_id) >>> +{ >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V4_1) >>> + return (clp->cl_exchange_flags != 0) == (use_exchange_id != >>> false); >>> +#else /* CONFIG_NFSD_V4_1 */ >>> + return 1; >>> +#endif /* CONFIG_NFSD_V4_1 */ >>> +} >> >> If the point is just to ensure that clients only match clients of the >> same minorversion, why not just call this >> match_client_minorversion()? >> You could still use cl_exchange_flags as the way to distinguish 4.0 >> from >> 4.1, but hide that detail away here. In which case clearer might be: >> >> static inline u32 client_minorversion(struct nfs4_client *clp) >> { >> /* >> * Note 4.1 clients always have one of >> * EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE{NON_PNFS,PNFS_MDS,PNFS_DS} set. >> */ >> return clp->cl_exchange_flags != 0; >> } >> >> static inline int client_same_minorversion(nfs4_client *clp, u32 >> minorversion) >> { >> return client_minorversion(clp) == minorversion; >> } >> >> or even just open-code the latter. > > I don't like using "minorversion" here since it is a numeric attribute > and may be larger than 1 in the future. What we care about here is > whether the clientid was established via EXCHANGE_ID or via nfsv4.0 > SET_CLIENTID et al, therefore we used cl_exchange_flags as an > indication. > >> >> But: are the 4.0 and 4.1 client owner-name namespaces actually >> meant to >> be distinct? 2.4.1 has me a bit confused here. > > This case is not implemented yet (note to self - update Doc) > If we implement it, and deal with v4.1 -> v4.1 downgrade (or > prevention > thereof), then I think we can indeed unify the clientid spaces. > However, 2.4.1 is optional and we don't have to implement it right > now. > > Benny > >> >> --b. >> >>> + >>> static struct nfs4_client * >>> -find_confirmed_client_by_str(const char *dname, unsigned int >>> hashval) >>> +find_confirmed_client_by_str(const char *dname, unsigned int >>> hashval, >>> + bool use_exchange_id) >>> { >>> struct nfs4_client *clp; >>> >>> list_for_each_entry(clp, &conf_str_hashtbl[hashval], cl_strhash) { >>> - if (same_name(clp->cl_recdir, dname)) >>> + if (same_name(clp->cl_recdir, dname) && >>> + match_clientid_establishment(clp, use_exchange_id)) >>> return clp; >>> } >>> return NULL; >>> } >>> >>> static struct nfs4_client * >>> -find_unconfirmed_client_by_str(const char *dname, unsigned int >>> hashval) >>> +find_unconfirmed_client_by_str(const char *dname, unsigned int >>> hashval, >>> + bool use_exchange_id) >>> { >>> struct nfs4_client *clp; >>> >>> list_for_each_entry(clp, &unconf_str_hashtbl[hashval], >>> cl_strhash) { >>> - if (same_name(clp->cl_recdir, dname)) >>> + if (same_name(clp->cl_recdir, dname) && >>> + match_clientid_establishment(clp, use_exchange_id)) >>> return clp; >>> } >>> return NULL; >>> @@ -895,7 +914,7 @@ nfsd4_exchange_id(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, >>> nfs4_lock_state(); >>> status = nfs_ok; >>> >>> - conf = find_confirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval); >>> + conf = find_confirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval, true); >>> if (conf) { >>> if (!same_verf(&verf, &conf->cl_verifier)) { >>> /* 18.35.4 case 8 */ >>> @@ -943,7 +962,7 @@ nfsd4_exchange_id(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, >>> } >>> } >>> >>> - unconf = find_unconfirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval); >>> + unconf = find_unconfirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval, true); >>> if (unconf) { >>> /* >>> * Possible retry or client restart. Per 18.35.4 case 4, >>> @@ -1041,7 +1060,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, >>> struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, >>> strhashval = clientstr_hashval(dname); >>> >>> nfs4_lock_state(); >>> - conf = find_confirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval); >>> + conf = find_confirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval, false); >>> if (conf) { >>> /* RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 0: */ >>> status = nfserr_clid_inuse; >>> @@ -1056,7 +1075,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, >>> struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, >>> * has a description of SETCLIENTID request processing consisting >>> * of 5 bullet points, labeled as CASE0 - CASE4 below. >>> */ >>> - unconf = find_unconfirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval); >>> + unconf = find_unconfirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval, false); >>> status = nfserr_resource; >>> if (!conf) { >>> /* >>> @@ -1211,7 +1230,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst >>> *rqstp, >>> unsigned int hash = >>> clientstr_hashval(unconf->cl_recdir); >>> conf = find_confirmed_client_by_str(unconf->cl_recdir, >>> - hash); >>> + hash, false); >>> if (conf) { >>> nfsd4_remove_clid_dir(conf); >>> expire_client(conf); >>> @@ -3332,12 +3351,12 @@ alloc_reclaim(void) >>> } >>> >>> int >>> -nfs4_has_reclaimed_state(const char *name) >>> +nfs4_has_reclaimed_state(const char *name, bool use_exchange_id) >>> { >>> unsigned int strhashval = clientstr_hashval(name); >>> struct nfs4_client *clp; >>> >>> - clp = find_confirmed_client_by_str(name, strhashval); >>> + clp = find_confirmed_client_by_str(name, strhashval, >>> use_exchange_id); >>> return clp ? 1 : 0; >>> } >>> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/nfsd/state.h b/include/linux/nfsd/state.h >>> index 5de36a7..feab6ec 100644 >>> --- a/include/linux/nfsd/state.h >>> +++ b/include/linux/nfsd/state.h >>> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ extern void nfsd4_init_recdir(char >>> *recdir_name); >>> extern int nfsd4_recdir_load(void); >>> extern void nfsd4_shutdown_recdir(void); >>> extern int nfs4_client_to_reclaim(const char *name); >>> -extern int nfs4_has_reclaimed_state(const char *name); >>> +extern int nfs4_has_reclaimed_state(const char *name, bool >>> use_exchange_id); >>> extern void nfsd4_recdir_purge_old(void); >>> extern int nfsd4_create_clid_dir(struct nfs4_client *clp); >>> extern void nfsd4_remove_clid_dir(struct nfs4_client *clp); >>> -- >>> 1.6.2.1 >>>