From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp107.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp107.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.52.176]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19773DDEFF for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 04:13:37 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <989B956029373F45A0B8AF02970818900D444B@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net> References: <989B956029373F45A0B8AF02970818900D444B@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <3EDDA705-0482-4E19-ABEA-4CD186185C14@embeddedalley.com> From: Dan Malek Subject: Re: Discussion about iopa() Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:06:55 -0500 To: Li Yang-r58472 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Tabi Timur-B04825 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Feb 8, 2007, at 4:22 AM, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: > Do you think we should remove iopa? I'm surprised it's still around :-) I had to fight hard many years ago to implement it, since I found it very useful for complex mappings we needed to manage uncached spaces for the MPC8xx. > The information is often not so obvious. ... I agree with you. Linux has the weirdest set (or lack of) VM APIs I've ever seen, to the point of preventing useful mapping or tracking attributes. Good luck with your argument to use useful functions, you have at least one person on your side :-) -- Dan