From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S270119AbTGSOYR (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:24:17 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270123AbTGSOYQ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:24:16 -0400
Received: from virtual.paginaweb.be ([212.3.242.133]:26579 "EHLO
	virtual.paginaweb.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S270119AbTGSOYO (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:24:14 -0400
Message-ID: <3F1957D3.1090308@unixtech.be>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 16:38:11 +0200
From: Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030714 Debian/1.3.1-3 StumbleUpon/1.73
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kernel 2.4.21
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi all,

I have a little question...


Summary of changes from v2.4.21-pre4 to v2.4.21-pre5
============================================

Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
   o ACPI apparently wasnt bios
   o fix wrong date in microcode comment
   o add another legitimate P4 type
   o must disallow write combine on 450NX
   o add framework for ndelay (nanoseconds)
   o first block of parisc resend
   o second block of parisc merge
   o third block of parisc merge
   o Ian Nelson moved
   o update videobook docs to avoid check_region
   o docs for IPMI
   o remove dead init call
   o add AMD hammer rng
   o IPMI driver updates
   o keyboard changes
   o fix wrong test in raw driver
   o fix paths for ide
   o clarify hpt37x config
   o fix more ide paths
   o Paul's fix to do ide_cs handling in task context
   o more ide paths
   o fix use of check_region in umc driver
   o more ide comment/doc info updates
   o promise printk cleanups
   o another wrong path
   o IDE printk/cleanup bits
   o fix padding on eepro driver

In this patch, is it possible that there is a problem in the fix of 
eepro driver? Since I upgrade the kernel with 2.4.20-8 (kernel-source 
tag in debian) which include this patch I have some problem with packets 
which are sometimes truncated... (the server runs an ircd and the result 
is a delink).

Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != 
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion 
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != 
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion 
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != 
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion 
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != 
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion 
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != 
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion 
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)

OR
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed 
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed 
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed 
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed 
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed 
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed 
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed 
at tcp.c(1545)


If I do a rollback, no more problems... I don't test yet a 2.4.21 kernel.

Hardware is a Dell PowerAppWeb 120A with one CPU P3 1 GHz / 256 Mo RAM /

Now Kernel is generated under debian with kernel-source-2.4.20-2 and gcc 
version 2.95.4 20011002.

Any idea? (Thanks for your help)

-- 
  Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be>
  http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64