From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Horrible ftruncate performance Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:32:28 +0400 Message-ID: <3F1E3A0C.1080909@namesys.com> References: <200307151848.59027.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <20030715170540.GA1213@namesys.com> <3F1D69AC.5040302@namesys.com> <1058892649.5042.29.camel@tiny.suse.com> <3F1D7DD8.3010806@namesys.com> <1058898249.2749.2.camel@tiny.suse.com> <20030723001645.GB8032@namesys.com> <3F1E2A54.5080805@namesys.com> <3F1E2207.3080409@mscc.huji.ac.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3F1E2207.3080409@mscc.huji.ac.il> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Voicu Liviu Cc: Oleg Drokin , Chris Mason , Dieter N?tzel , Szakacsits Szabolcs , Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Voicu Liviu wrote: > > Then what is the key strength? Or better to ask, how does V4 differs > from V3? > Best regards, > Liviu Plugins. Raw performance, of which the repacker is just an aspect. -- Hans