From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>
Cc: Yury Umanets <umka@namesys.com>,
Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
reiserfs mailing list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>,
Alexander Lyamin <flx@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:30:35 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F25095B.6070607@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1059315015.10692.207.camel@sonja>
Daniel Egger wrote:
>Are you sure CF cards have wear leveling? I'm pretty confident that they
>have defect sector management but no wear leveling. There's a huge
>difference between those two.
>
I am told that they do by flx. After all, they are most used for the
FAT filesystem.
--
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-28 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-23 21:02 Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Hans Reiser
2003-07-24 4:26 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-24 4:31 ` Shawn
2003-07-24 4:56 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-24 5:21 ` Shawn
2003-07-24 5:33 ` Shawn
2003-07-24 11:10 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-07-24 15:10 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-24 15:26 ` Larry McVoy
2003-07-24 15:32 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-24 15:54 ` Larry McVoy
2003-08-01 16:15 ` Reiser4 and linux 2.6.0 Robert August Vincent II
2003-08-01 16:27 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-08-01 16:32 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-08-09 15:45 ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-10 2:02 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-08-10 12:30 ` Henning Westerholt
2003-08-11 11:25 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-08-01 17:16 ` Marcelo Pacheco
2003-08-01 16:29 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-08-02 0:11 ` Robert August Vincent II
2003-07-24 15:32 ` Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Shawn
2003-07-24 15:33 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2003-07-24 15:47 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-24 15:57 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2003-07-24 16:24 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2003-07-24 16:01 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-07-24 16:08 ` Marcelo
2003-07-24 20:39 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-27 12:28 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 12:45 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-27 14:01 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 15:04 ` Gene Heskett
2003-07-27 22:07 ` Manuel Krause
2003-07-27 21:19 ` Manuel Krause
2003-07-24 15:59 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-24 17:07 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-07-24 21:10 ` Tupshin Harper
2003-07-25 12:57 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-07-25 0:39 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-25 13:02 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-07-25 14:20 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-25 14:39 ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-26 1:08 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-26 7:19 ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-26 14:13 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-26 14:54 ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-26 15:21 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-27 3:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-27 10:30 ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-27 11:05 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-27 11:46 ` Yury Umanets
2003-08-08 14:01 ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-08 14:01 ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-08 14:28 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-08-08 23:58 ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-09 0:29 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-08-09 0:38 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-27 13:31 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 14:13 ` Yury Umanets
2003-07-27 13:28 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 14:10 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-27 14:15 ` Yury Umanets
2003-08-13 20:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-14 5:04 ` Yury Umanets
2003-08-14 14:10 ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-15 11:15 ` Yury Umanets
2003-08-15 15:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-08-15 15:53 ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-14 13:58 ` David Woodhouse
2003-08-14 13:58 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-27 15:30 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-07-27 15:49 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-08 13:23 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-28 11:30 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2003-09-10 8:29 ` myciel
2003-07-26 17:14 ` Jussi Laako
2003-07-27 13:35 ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-08 14:08 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-27 12:59 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 14:16 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-27 15:32 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-08-08 14:29 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-28 12:44 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-28 13:06 ` Daniel Egger
2003-07-28 13:29 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-28 13:48 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-27 12:38 ` Hans Reiser
2003-07-26 8:33 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-27 13:24 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F25095B.6070607@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=Nikita@Namesys.COM \
--cc=degger@fhm.edu \
--cc=flx@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=umka@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.