From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272483AbTGaNk5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:40:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272998AbTGaNk4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:40:56 -0400 Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.52]:56252 "EHLO mtaw4.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272483AbTGaNkw (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:40:52 -0400 Message-ID: <3F291A0F.1050406@pacbell.net> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:30:55 -0700 From: David Brownell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Alan Stern , Dominik Brugger , kernel list , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume References: <1059153629.528.2.camel@gaston> <3F21B3BF.1030104@pacbell.net> <20030726210123.GD266@elf.ucw.cz> <3F288CAB.6020401@pacbell.net> <20030731094749.GB464@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20030731094749.GB464@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: >>The "initiators" all talk to _both_ infrastructures, but they >>don't talk to the driver model stuff in the same way. For >>example, on suspend: >> >> ... > > Where does acpi call pm_*()? It seems like it does not and it seems > like a bug to me. Doesn't; it showed up in a 'grep' that I should have examined more closely. Sorry! But both swsusp and APM have the "using both registration schemes" issue (consistency matters here). Why does it seem like a bug -- because it's using only the "new" infrastructure, while there are still a few drivers that only register to the old one? I'd rather see those drivers (about a dozen) have compile time #ifdef CONFIG_PM #warnings, and call them the bug... - Dave