From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
Subject: Re: dosemu 1.1.5.6
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:43:55 +0400
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <3F3CF1AB.7010601@aknet.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------010806060703010701090102"
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010806060703010701090102
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello.

Grigory Batalov wrote:
> FYI, LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 doesn't work for me.
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is a temporary solution
that was intended to be removed as soon as
the proper fix is found.
Unfortunately the side-effect is that people
are no longer interested in testing the potential
fixes - they are quite fine with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
and I don't see how this can be resolved without
backing out the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL thing but this
is also not good before there is a tested fix:(

> Without LD_ASSUME_KERNEL it works. I use kernel 2.4.20
> and glibc-2.2.6 from ALTLinux distribution (www.altlinux.com).
Is there any chance for ALTLinux to get upgraded
to NPTL so that you can test the patches?

The potential fix I am talking about is attached.
If anyone have a broken DPMI due to NPTL without
an LD_ASSUME_KERNEL thing, please test.

--------------010806060703010701090102
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="safecode3.diff"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="safecode3.diff"

--- src/arch/linux/async/sigsegv.c	Sat Jun  7 12:10:16 2003
+++ src/arch/linux/async/sigsegv.c	Thu Jul 17 20:52:08 2003
@@ -324,16 +324,21 @@
 {
  /*
   * FIRST thing to do - to avoid being trapped into int0x11
-  * forever, we must clear AC before doing anything else!
-  * Clear also ID for some reasons?
+  * forever, we must restore the eflags.
+  * Also restore the %fs and %gs for compatibility with NPTL.
   */
- __asm__ __volatile__ (" \
-	pushfl\n \
-	popl	%%eax\n \
-	andl	%0,%%eax\n \
-	pushl	%%eax\n \
-	popfl" \
-	: : "i"(~(AC|ID)) : "%eax");
+  if (in_dpmi && !in_vm86 && context.cs != UCODESEL) {
+    __asm__ __volatile__ (" \
+	pushl	%0\n \
+	popfl\n \
+	movw	%1, %%fs\n \
+	movw	%2, %%gs\n \
+	" \
+	: :
+	"m"(emu_stack_frame->eflags),
+	"m"(emu_stack_frame->fs),
+	"m"(emu_stack_frame->gs));
+  }
 
   fault_cnt++;
 
--- src/dosext/dpmi/dpmi.c	Wed Jul 16 21:54:22 2003
+++ src/dosext/dpmi/dpmi.c	Thu Jul 17 20:15:45 2003
@@ -142,8 +142,8 @@
 unsigned short DPMI_SEL = 0;
 
 struct sigcontext_struct dpmi_stack_frame[DPMI_MAX_CLIENTS]; /* used to store the dpmi client registers */
-static struct sigcontext_struct _emu_stack_frame;  /* used to store emulator registers */
-static struct sigcontext_struct *emu_stack_frame = &_emu_stack_frame;
+struct sigcontext_struct _emu_stack_frame;  /* used to store emulator registers */
+struct sigcontext_struct *emu_stack_frame = &_emu_stack_frame;
 
 #define CHECK_SELECTOR(x) \
 { if (!ValidAndUsedSelector(x) || SystemSelector(x)) { \
--- src/dosext/dpmi/dpmi.h	Wed Jul 16 21:54:20 2003
+++ src/dosext/dpmi/dpmi.h	Thu Jul 17 20:16:34 2003
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@
 extern INTDESC Interrupt_Table[0x100];
 extern SEGDESC Segments[];
 extern struct sigcontext_struct dpmi_stack_frame[DPMI_MAX_CLIENTS];
+extern struct sigcontext_struct *emu_stack_frame;
 /* used to store the dpmi client registers */
 extern RealModeCallBack mouseCallBack; /* user\'s mouse routine */
 extern char *ldt_buffer;

--------------010806060703010701090102--