From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: myciel Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:29:44 +0200 Message-ID: <3F5EE0F8.1010208@dotcom.pl> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <1059062380.29238.260.camel@sonja> <16160.4704.102110.352311@laputa.namesys.com> <1059093594.29239.314.camel@sonja> <16161.10863.793737.229170@laputa.namesys.com> <1059142851.6962.18.camel@sonja> <1059143985.19594.3.camel@haron.namesys.com> <1059181687.10059.5.camel@sonja> <1059203990.21910.13.camel@haron.namesys.com> <1059228808.10692.7.camel@sonja> <3F23D38B.3020309@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3F23D38B.3020309@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs mailing list Hans Reiser wrote: > it is suitable for any flash device that has wear leveling built into > the hardware (e.g. all compact flash cards), or for which a wear > leveling block device driver is used (I don't know if one exists for > Linux). I'm thinking about using ide flash disk for journal device - is it good idea? there are such disks with wear leveling available, but can someone tell difference betwen dynamic and static wear leveling? thanks rafal