From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:02:14 +0200 Message-ID: <3F8A29A200001472@ocpmta1.freegates.net> In-Reply-To: <20031015045242.GB7351@colo.lackof.org> From: "Joel Soete" Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] L2000/N4000 smp devices/boot compare?? To: "Grant Grundler" Cc: "Matthew Wilcox" , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, "Derek Engelhaupt" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Grant, Thanks for all (advise, attention, ...) Joel PS: for me it is already a progress: i finaly reach to understand some concept as 'aliasing' (still have to understand exatly coherent and no-coherent, ... :) ) >-- Original Message -- >Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:52:42 -0600 >From: Grant Grundler >To: Joel Soete >Cc: Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, > Derek Engelhaupt >Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] L2000/N4000 smp devices/boot compare?? > > >On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:59:52PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote: > If I well understand it means that a same real (absolute) address > has a different virtual addresse for each processor? multiple translations. It can be across processors but doesn't h >ve to be. > (btw Do you have any idea where i can find of the detail way to implement > it?) If someone had worked it out and provided a patch, we probably be using it. I think that's what you (or someone) needs to do. sorry, grant ------------------------------------------------------------------------- L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. Tiscali ADSL, 19,50 Euro pendant 3 mois! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr