All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
	Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
	Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI

[NOTES:
 * In this cycle the regressions reported by e-mail will only be put into the
   Bugzilla 1 week after they have been submitted, if not fixed in the
   meantime.  The reason is that some regressions are fixed in less than a
   week time and there's no point listing them.  [We also hope that people will 
   try to fix bugs faster to avoid being listed. ;-)]  If that works, we'll
   adopt it as a general rule.

 * All of the regressions reported by e-mail that are listed below have been
   put into the Bugzilla by Maciej, because I literally didn't have the time
   to do that (that's also why the summary reports are delayed).
   Thanks Maciej!]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2010-03-21       15       13          10


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2010-03-14 7:58 (8 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15584
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: lockdep warning on geode subnotebook
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2010-03-13 10:51 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100313105109.GA9966@elf.ucw.cz>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126847750927601&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15555
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
Submitter	: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-03-10 8:29 (12 days old)
Message-ID	: <2375c9f91003100029q7d64bbf7xce15eee97f7e2190@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126820979017089&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15549
Subject		: [2.6.34-rc1][libata] regression?
Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Date		: 2010-03-09 21:47 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <4B96C202.6050606@numericable.fr>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126817180811846&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
Subject		: BUG: key f70f4b50 not in .data
Submitter	: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-03-09 10:27 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100309102754.GA3316@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126813046113130&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533
Subject		: i915 fails to set mode in 2.6.34-rc1, ok in 2.6.33-rc8
Submitter	: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@yahoo.com>
Date		: 2010-03-13 20:37 (9 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
Subject		: CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date		: 2010-03-11 15:37 (11 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15496
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup
Submitter	: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date		: 2010-03-09 19:40 (13 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
Subject		: Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
Submitter	: Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date		: 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old)


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1 hangs for 30 seconds when trying to access the disk
Submitter	: Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-03-14 23:26 (8 days old)
Handled-By	: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25516


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject		: No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter	: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date		: 2010-03-10 06:59 (12 days old)
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
Subject		: [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
Submitter	: Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
Date		: 2010-03-09 01:24 (13 days old)
Handled-By	: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310

Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.

Thanks!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
	Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
	Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI

[NOTES:
 * In this cycle the regressions reported by e-mail will only be put into the
   Bugzilla 1 week after they have been submitted, if not fixed in the
   meantime.  The reason is that some regressions are fixed in less than a
   week time and there's no point listing them.  [We also hope that people will 
   try to fix bugs faster to avoid being listed. ;-)]  If that works, we'll
   adopt it as a general rule.

 * All of the regressions reported by e-mail that are listed below have been
   put into the Bugzilla by Maciej, because I literally didn't have the time
   to do that (that's also why the summary reports are delayed).
   Thanks Maciej!]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2010-03-21       15       13          10


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-14 7:58 (8 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100314075831.GA13457-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15584
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: lockdep warning on geode subnotebook
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 10:51 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100313105109.GA9966-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126847750927601&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15555
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
Submitter	: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-10 8:29 (12 days old)
Message-ID	: <2375c9f91003100029q7d64bbf7xce15eee97f7e2190-JsoAwUIsXounXO2b/Sh1tA@public.gmane.orgom>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126820979017089&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15549
Subject		: [2.6.34-rc1][libata] regression?
Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 21:47 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <4B96C202.6050606-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126817180811846&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
Subject		: BUG: key f70f4b50 not in .data
Submitter	: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 10:27 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100309102754.GA3316-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126813046113130&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533
Subject		: i915 fails to set mode in 2.6.34-rc1, ok in 2.6.33-rc8
Submitter	: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 20:37 (9 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
Subject		: CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-11 15:37 (11 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15496
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup
Submitter	: Thomas Meyer <thomas-VsYtu1Qij5c@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 19:40 (13 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
Subject		: Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
Submitter	: Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci-x0m+Mc+nT7uljOmnV8AmnkElSqmLX1BE@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old)


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1 hangs for 30 seconds when trying to access the disk
Submitter	: Andrew Benton <b3nton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-14 23:26 (8 days old)
Handled-By	: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25516


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject		: No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter	: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-10 06:59 (12 days old)
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
Subject		: [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
Submitter	: Yanko Kaneti <yaneti-jUE9FD3ILm5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 01:24 (13 days old)
Handled-By	: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310

Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
	Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
	Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI

[NOTES:
 * In this cycle the regressions reported by e-mail will only be put into the
   Bugzilla 1 week after they have been submitted, if not fixed in the
   meantime.  The reason is that some regressions are fixed in less than a
   week time and there's no point listing them.  [We also hope that people will 
   try to fix bugs faster to avoid being listed. ;-)]  If that works, we'll
   adopt it as a general rule.

 * All of the regressions reported by e-mail that are listed below have been
   put into the Bugzilla by Maciej, because I literally didn't have the time
   to do that (that's also why the summary reports are delayed).
   Thanks Maciej!]

This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
  ----------------------------------------
  2010-03-21       15       13          10


Unresolved regressions
----------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-14 7:58 (8 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100314075831.GA13457-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15584
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: lockdep warning on geode subnotebook
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 10:51 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100313105109.GA9966-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126847750927601&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15555
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
Submitter	: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-10 8:29 (12 days old)
Message-ID	: <2375c9f91003100029q7d64bbf7xce15eee97f7e2190-JsoAwUIsXounXO2b/Sh1tA@public.gmane.orgom>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126820979017089&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15549
Subject		: [2.6.34-rc1][libata] regression?
Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 21:47 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <4B96C202.6050606-Bf/eaXMDFuuXqB7oj33eUg@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126817180811846&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
Subject		: BUG: key f70f4b50 not in .data
Submitter	: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 10:27 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100309102754.GA3316-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126813046113130&w=2


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533
Subject		: i915 fails to set mode in 2.6.34-rc1, ok in 2.6.33-rc8
Submitter	: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 20:37 (9 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
Subject		: CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-11 15:37 (11 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15496
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup
Submitter	: Thomas Meyer <thomas-VsYtu1Qij5c@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 19:40 (13 days old)


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
Subject		: Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
Submitter	: Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci-x0m+Mc+nT7uljOmnV8AmnkElSqmLX1BE@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old)


Regressions with patches
------------------------

Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1 hangs for 30 seconds when trying to access the disk
Submitter	: Andrew Benton <b3nton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-14 23:26 (8 days old)
Handled-By	: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25516


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject		: No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter	: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-10 06:59 (12 days old)
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
Subject		: [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
Submitter	: Yanko Kaneti <yaneti-jUE9FD3ILm5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 01:24 (13 days old)
Handled-By	: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512


For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.

As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310

Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-21 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas, Yanko Kaneti

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
Subject		: [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
Submitter	: Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
Date		: 2010-03-09 01:24 (13 days old)
Handled-By	: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch		: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15495] Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Villacis Lasso

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
Subject		: Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
Submitter	: Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date		: 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15505] No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Casteyde,
	Jesse Barnes, Yinghai Lu

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject		: No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter	: Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date		: 2010-03-10 06:59 (12 days old)
Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch		: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15496] 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-03-24 19:29     ` Thomas Meyer
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Thomas Meyer

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15496
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup
Submitter	: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date		: 2010-03-09 19:40 (13 days old)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15495] Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
@ 2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Villacis Lasso

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
Subject		: Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
Submitter	: Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci-x0m+Mc+nT7uljOmnV8AmnkElSqmLX1BE@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15537] 2.6.34-rc1 hangs for 30 seconds when trying to access the disk
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Benton, Jeff Garzik

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1 hangs for 30 seconds when trying to access the disk
Submitter	: Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-03-14 23:26 (8 days old)
Handled-By	: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25516



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15549] [2.6.34-rc1][libata] regression?
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Etienne Basset

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15549
Subject		: [2.6.34-rc1][libata] regression?
Submitter	: Etienne Basset <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Date		: 2010-03-09 21:47 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <4B96C202.6050606@numericable.fr>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126817180811846&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15548] BUG: key f70f4b50 not in .data
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sergey Senozhatsky

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
Subject		: BUG: key f70f4b50 not in .data
Submitter	: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-03-09 10:27 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100309102754.GA3316@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126813046113130&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15533] i915 fails to set mode in 2.6.34-rc1, ok in 2.6.33-rc8
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pete Zaitcev

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533
Subject		: i915 fails to set mode in 2.6.34-rc1, ok in 2.6.33-rc8
Submitter	: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@yahoo.com>
Date		: 2010-03-13 20:37 (9 days old)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15518] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-03-24 17:00   ` Daniel Vetter
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Daniel Vetter

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
Subject		: CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date		: 2010-03-11 15:37 (11 days old)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15537] 2.6.34-rc1 hangs for 30 seconds when trying to access the disk
@ 2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Benton, Jeff Garzik

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1 hangs for 30 seconds when trying to access the disk
Submitter	: Andrew Benton <b3nton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-14 23:26 (8 days old)
Handled-By	: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25516


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15548] BUG: key f70f4b50 not in .data
@ 2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sergey Senozhatsky

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15548
Subject		: BUG: key f70f4b50 not in .data
Submitter	: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-09 10:27 (13 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100309102754.GA3316-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126813046113130&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15584] 2.6.34-rc1: lockdep warning on geode subnotebook
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15584
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: lockdep warning on geode subnotebook
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2010-03-13 10:51 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100313105109.GA9966@elf.ucw.cz>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126847750927601&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter	: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date		: 2010-03-14 7:58 (8 days old)
Message-ID	: <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-21 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (9 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15555] 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Américo Wang

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15555
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
Submitter	: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-03-10 8:29 (12 days old)
Message-ID	: <2375c9f91003100029q7d64bbf7xce15eee97f7e2190@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126820979017089&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15555] 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
@ 2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-21 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Américo Wang

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15555
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
Submitter	: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date		: 2010-03-10 8:29 (12 days old)
Message-ID	: <2375c9f91003100029q7d64bbf7xce15eee97f7e2190@mail.gmail.com>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126820979017089&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-22 13:57 ` John W. Linville
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2010-03-22 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-wireless

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 08:58:56PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

Unless I'm missing something, none of these seem to be wireless LAN
stuff (even the one affecting b43).  Awesome job wireless folks!

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
  2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-03-22 17:12   ` Linus Torvalds
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-03-22 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alex Villacis Lasso
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
	Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
	Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI


On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
> Subject		: Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
> Submitter	: Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
> Date		: 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old)

Fixed by commit 3836a03d978e68b0ae00d3589089343c998cd4ff ("anon_inodes: 
mark the anon inode private"), I'm pretty sure.

		Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-03-22 17:12   ` Linus Torvalds
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-03-22 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Alex Villacis Lasso
  Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
	Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki


On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
> Subject		: Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
> Submitter	: Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
> Date		: 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old)

Fixed by commit 3836a03d978e68b0ae00d3589089343c998cd4ff ("anon_inodes: 
mark the anon inode private"), I'm pretty sure.

		Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
  2010-03-22 17:12   ` Linus Torvalds
  (?)
@ 2010-03-22 21:20   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-22 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds
  Cc: Alex Villacis Lasso, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
	Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
	DRI

On Monday 22 March 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
> > Subject		: Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
> > Submitter	: Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
> > Date		: 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old)
> 
> Fixed by commit 3836a03d978e68b0ae00d3589089343c998cd4ff ("anon_inodes: 
> mark the anon inode private"), I'm pretty sure.

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
  2010-03-22 17:12   ` Linus Torvalds
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2010-03-22 21:20   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-22 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds
  Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
	Alex Villacis Lasso, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI,
	Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On Monday 22 March 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
> > Subject		: Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd
> > Submitter	: Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
> > Date		: 2010-03-09 16:47 (13 days old)
> 
> Fixed by commit 3836a03d978e68b0ae00d3589089343c998cd4ff ("anon_inodes: 
> mark the anon inode private"), I'm pretty sure.

Thanks, closed.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15518] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
  2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15518] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-03-24 17:00   ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2010-03-24 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Daniel Vetter

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:13:28PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
> Subject		: CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
> Submitter	: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Date		: 2010-03-11 15:37 (11 days old)

I've just retested on 3.6.34-rc2. NO_BOOTMEM=y still crashes with a
plethora of backtraces somewhere in early boot. Disabling this option
still works around the problem
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15496] 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup
  2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15496] 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-03-24 19:29     ` Thomas Meyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Meyer @ 2010-03-24 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

Yes, please still list this bug.


Am 21.03.2010 um 21:13 schrieb "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary  
> report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the  
> tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry    : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15496
> Subject        : 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup
> Submitter    : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
> Date        : 2010-03-09 19:40 (13 days old)
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15496] 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup
@ 2010-03-24 19:29     ` Thomas Meyer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Meyer @ 2010-03-24 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

Yes, please still list this bug.


Am 21.03.2010 um 21:13 schrieb "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>:

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary  
> report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the  
> tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry    : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15496
> Subject        : 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup
> Submitter    : Thomas Meyer <thomas-VsYtu1Qij5c@public.gmane.org>
> Date        : 2010-03-09 19:40 (13 days old)
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15555] 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
  2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  (?)
@ 2010-03-26  6:13   ` Américo Wang
  2010-03-26 21:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 95+ messages in thread
From: Américo Wang @ 2010-03-26  6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15555
> Subject         : 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
> Submitter       : Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> Date            : 2010-03-10 8:29 (12 days old)
> Message-ID      : <2375c9f91003100029q7d64bbf7xce15eee97f7e2190@mail.gmail.com>
> References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126820979017089&w=2
>

I can't reproduce this bug any more.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15555] 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
@ 2010-03-26 21:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-26 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Américo Wang
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Friday 26 March 2010, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15555
> > Subject         : 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
> > Submitter       : Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> > Date            : 2010-03-10 8:29 (12 days old)
> > Message-ID      : <2375c9f91003100029q7d64bbf7xce15eee97f7e2190@mail.gmail.com>
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126820979017089&w=2
> >
> 
> I can't reproduce this bug any more.

Thanks, closing.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15555] 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
@ 2010-03-26 21:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-03-26 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Américo Wang
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Friday 26 March 2010, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15555
> > Subject         : 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989!
> > Submitter       : Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date            : 2010-03-10 8:29 (12 days old)
> > Message-ID      : <2375c9f91003100029q7d64bbf7xce15eee97f7e2190@mail.gmail.com>
> > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126820979017089&w=2
> >
> 
> I can't reproduce this bug any more.

Thanks, closing.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-06-20 22:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2010-06-26  1:04   ` Christian Kujau
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-06-26  1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Jindřich Makovička, Michael Ellerman, Grant Likely,
	Alexey Dobriyan

Sorry for the late reply:

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 at 00:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).

Yes, the bug is still present in 2.6.34 and .35-rc3, but a tested patch is 
available, hopefully to be included in 2.6.35.

Thanks,
Christian.

> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
> Message-ID	: < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> 		  Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
> Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> 		  http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
-- 
BOFH excuse #302:

microelectronic Riemannian curved-space fault in write-only file system

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-21 22:43       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List

On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
> > Message-ID	: < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> > Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> > 		  Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
> > Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> > 		  http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
> 
> At least the effects on b2c2-flexcop-pci are still valid, in linux-2.6
> HEAD and linux-next (next-20100621).

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-21 22:43       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-21 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List

On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
> > Message-ID	: < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> > Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
> > 		  Jindøich Makovièka <makovick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> > 		  http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
> 
> At least the effects on b2c2-flexcop-pci are still valid, in linux-2.6
> HEAD and linux-next (next-20100621).

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-06-20 22:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  (?)
@ 2010-06-21 22:19   ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  2010-06-21 22:43       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 95+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-06-21 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1155 bytes --]

Hi

On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
> Message-ID	: < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> 		  Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
> Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
> 		  http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html

At least the effects on b2c2-flexcop-pci are still valid, in linux-2.6
HEAD and linux-next (next-20100621).

Regards
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-06-20 22:32 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-20 22:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau,
	Jindřich Makovička, Michael Ellerman

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
Message-ID	: < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
		  Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
		  http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-20 22:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-20 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau,
	Jindřich Makovička, Michael Ellerman

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (100 days old)
Message-ID	: < <AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh-JsoAwUIsXov1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.orgl.com>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
		  Jindřich Makovička <makovick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
		  http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-06-14  6:39           ` Alexey Dobriyan
@ 2010-06-14 15:42             ` Grant Likely
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-14 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Dobriyan
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On brief review, they look like completely different issues.  I doubt
>> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
>
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()

I think we've crossed wires.  By second patch I mean the patch that
changes OF code.  That change has absolutely no bearing on the
flexcop-pci driver.  The patch to the flexcop-pci driver looks correct
to me, but it is completely unrelated to the OF badness.

g.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-14 15:42             ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-14 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Dobriyan
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On brief review, they look like completely different issues.  I doubt
>> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
>
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()

I think we've crossed wires.  By second patch I mean the patch that
changes OF code.  That change has absolutely no bearing on the
flexcop-pci driver.  The patch to the flexcop-pci driver looks correct
to me, but it is completely unrelated to the OF badness.

g.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-06-14  6:39           ` Alexey Dobriyan
@ 2010-06-14 12:27             ` Jindrich Makovicka
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Jindrich Makovicka @ 2010-06-14 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: kernel-testers, linux-media

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On brief review, they look like completely different issues.  I
> > doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
> 
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()

Yes, the latter patch dodges the issue with flexcop driver by simply
skipping the directory creation, but both patches should be applied IMO.
The former to fix the flexcop driver because we can trivially fix it,
the latter to solve problems with any generic bogus firmware.

-- 
Jindrich Makovicka



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-14 12:27             ` Jindrich Makovicka
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Jindrich Makovicka @ 2010-06-14 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-media; +Cc: kernel-testers, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, linux-media

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On brief review, they look like completely different issues.  I
> > doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
> 
> It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()

Yes, the latter patch dodges the issue with flexcop driver by simply
skipping the directory creation, but both patches should be applied IMO.
The former to fix the flexcop driver because we can trivially fix it,
the latter to solve problems with any generic bogus firmware.

-- 
Jindrich Makovicka



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-14  6:39           ` Alexey Dobriyan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-06-14  6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On brief review, they look like completely different issues.  I doubt
> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.

It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-14  6:39           ` Alexey Dobriyan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-06-14  6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On brief review, they look like completely different issues.  I doubt
> the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.

It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 19:57         ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-13 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
>> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
>
> So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?
>
> * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
>  ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver.
>
> * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
>  ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their
>  name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go
>  away too.
>
> Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that
> Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually.

On brief review, they look like completely different issues.  I doubt
the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.  I'll pick up the
device tree patch, but the flexcop-pci patch should go in by the
v4l/dvb tree.

g.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 19:57         ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-06-13 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Michael Ellerman, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
>> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
>
> So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?
>
> * http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
>  ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver.
>
> * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
>  ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their
>  name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go
>  away too.
>
> Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that
> Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually.

On brief review, they look like completely different issues.  I doubt
the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.  I'll pick up the
device tree patch, but the flexcop-pci patch should go in by the
v4l/dvb tree.

g.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 18:10       ` Christian Kujau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-06-13 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman,
	linux-media, mchehab

On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue 
> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:

So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?

* http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
  ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver.

* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
  ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their
  name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go 
  away too. 

Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that 
Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually.

Thanks,
Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #363:

Out of cards on drive D:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 18:10       ` Christian Kujau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-06-13 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Michael Ellerman,
	linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ

On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue 
> for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:

So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?

* http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html
  ...fixes the flexcop-pci.c driver.

* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/
  ...fixes "some bogus firmwares include properties with "/" in their
  name". I'm not sure if this would make the flexcop-pci.c badness go 
  away too. 

Anyway, both patches are not upstream yet, but Michael mentioned that 
Grant Likely or Ben might push it eventually.

Thanks,
Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #363:

Out of cards on drive D:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-06-13 14:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-13 15:22     ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-06-13 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman, linux-media, mchehab

Hi

On Sunday 13 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old)
> Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/

Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue 
for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
	From:		Jindřich Makovička <makovick@gmail.com>
	Subject:		[PATCH] DVB flexcop-pci: sanitize driver name to avoid warning on load
	Date:		Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200
	Message-ID:	<AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh@mail.gmail.com>
	URL:			http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html

Regards
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 15:22     ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-06-13 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman,
	linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	mchehab-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ

Hi

On Sunday 13 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old)
> Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
> Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/

Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue 
for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
	From:		Jindřich Makovička <makovick-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
	Subject:		[PATCH] DVB flexcop-pci: sanitize driver name to avoid warning on load
	Date:		Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:51:30 +0200
	Message-ID:	<AANLkTikNcCtUn9SQwKu2b3IE6NiAwAhciHsm1HVH4EJh-JsoAwUIsXotQFR93xxRIaA@public.gmane.orgcom>
	URL:			http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1006.0/00137.html

Regards
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-06-13 14:45 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-13 14:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old)
Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-06-13 14:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau, Michael Ellerman

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.  Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (93 days old)
Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Handled-By	: Michael Ellerman <michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
Patch		: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/52978/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-05-09 22:27     ` Christian Kujau
  (?)
@ 2010-05-09 23:34       ` Michael Ellerman
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-05-09 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, adobriyan, schwab,
	linuxppc-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --]

On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> 
> The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] 
> which made the warning go away.
> 
> @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be 
>           pushed into mainline?

No, Benh and I decided it's better to just drop those properties all
together. But it's too late in this cycle for a patch like that just to
fix a warning - so we'll do that patch for 35.

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 23:34       ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-05-09 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev,
	schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 922 bytes --]

On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> 
> The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] 
> which made the warning go away.
> 
> @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be 
>           pushed into mainline?

No, Benh and I decided it's better to just drop those properties all
together. But it's too late in this cycle for a patch like that just to
fix a warning - so we'll do that patch for 35.

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 23:34       ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-05-09 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 977 bytes --]

On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> 
> The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] 
> which made the warning go away.
> 
> @Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be 
>           pushed into mainline?

No, Benh and I decided it's better to just drop those properties all
together. But it's too late in this cycle for a patch like that just to
fix a warning - so we'll do that patch for 35.

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-05-09 21:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  (?)
@ 2010-05-09 22:27     ` Christian Kujau
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-05-09 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	adobriyan, schwab, michael, linuxppc-dev

On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2

The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] 
which made the warning go away.

@Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be 
          pushed into mainline?

Thanks,
Christian.

[0] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50557/

diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
 	return fixed_name;
 }
 
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+	char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+	fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!fixed_name) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+				"name \"%s\"\n", name);
+	return name;
+	}
+
+	p = fixed_name;
+	while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+		*p++ = '_';
+
+	return fixed_name;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
  */
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
 		if (duplicate_name(de, p))
 			p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
 
+		if (strstr(p, "/"))
+			p = unslash_name(p);
+
 		ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
 		if (ent == NULL)
 			break;
-- 
BOFH excuse #188:

..disk or the processor is on fire.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 22:27     ` Christian Kujau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-05-09 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab,
	Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2

The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] 
which made the warning go away.

@Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be 
          pushed into mainline?

Thanks,
Christian.

[0] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50557/

diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
 	return fixed_name;
 }
 
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+	char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+	fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!fixed_name) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+				"name \"%s\"\n", name);
+	return name;
+	}
+
+	p = fixed_name;
+	while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+		*p++ = '_';
+
+	return fixed_name;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
  */
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
 		if (duplicate_name(de, p))
 			p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
 
+		if (strstr(p, "/"))
+			p = unslash_name(p);
+
 		ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
 		if (ent == NULL)
 			break;
-- 
BOFH excuse #188:

..disk or the processor is on fire.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 22:27     ` Christian Kujau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-05-09 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g,
	michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A

On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
> Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2

The bug is still present in -rc6, but Michael Ellerman has a patch[0] 
which made the warning go away.

@Michael: will you post your patch with a Sign-Off, so that it can be 
          pushed into mainline?

Thanks,
Christian.

[0] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50557/

diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
 	return fixed_name;
 }
 
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+	char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+	fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!fixed_name) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+				"name \"%s\"\n", name);
+	return name;
+	}
+
+	p = fixed_name;
+	while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+		*p++ = '_';
+
+	return fixed_name;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
  */
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
 		if (duplicate_name(de, p))
 			p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
 
+		if (strstr(p, "/"))
+			p = unslash_name(p);
+
 		ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
 		if (ent == NULL)
 			break;
-- 
BOFH excuse #188:

..disk or the processor is on fire.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-05-09 21:13 2.6.34-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-09 21:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-09 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-09 21:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-09 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
Message-ID	: <<alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-05  0:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Christian Kujau, linux-media

On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> 
> Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
> 
> [    8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
> [    8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
> [    8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
> [    8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
> [    8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
> [    8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
> [    8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
> [    8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
> [    8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> [    8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
> [    8.818833] Call Trace:
> [    8.818837]  [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
> [    8.818839]  [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
> [    8.818842]  [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
> [    8.818844]  [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
> [    8.818846]  [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
> [    8.818849]  [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
> [    8.818852]  [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
> [    8.818855]  [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [    8.818858]  [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
> [    8.818860]  [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [    8.818864]  [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
> [    8.818867]  [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
> [    8.818870]  [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
> [    8.818872]  [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
> [    8.818874]  [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
> [    8.818876]  [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
> [    8.818878]  [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
> [    8.818880]  [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
> [    8.818882]  [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
> [    8.818884]  [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
> [    8.818887]  [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [    8.818890]  [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
> [    8.818893]  [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
> [    8.818896]  [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [    8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
> [    8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
> [    8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-05  0:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Christian Kujau, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA

On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> 
> Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
> 
> [    8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
> [    8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
> [    8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
> [    8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
> [    8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
> [    8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
> [    8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
> [    8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
> [    8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> [    8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
> [    8.818833] Call Trace:
> [    8.818837]  [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
> [    8.818839]  [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
> [    8.818842]  [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
> [    8.818844]  [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
> [    8.818846]  [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
> [    8.818849]  [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
> [    8.818852]  [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
> [    8.818855]  [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [    8.818858]  [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
> [    8.818860]  [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [    8.818864]  [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
> [    8.818867]  [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
> [    8.818870]  [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
> [    8.818872]  [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
> [    8.818874]  [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
> [    8.818876]  [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
> [    8.818878]  [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
> [    8.818880]  [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
> [    8.818882]  [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
> [    8.818884]  [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
> [    8.818887]  [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [    8.818890]  [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
> [    8.818893]  [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
> [    8.818896]  [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [    8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
> [    8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
> [    8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6

Thanks for the update.

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-05  0:18     ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-05-05  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Christian Kujau, linux-media

Hi

On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2

Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:

[    8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
[    8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
[    8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
[    8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
[    8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[    8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
[    8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
[    8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
[    8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[    8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
[    8.818833] Call Trace:
[    8.818837]  [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
[    8.818839]  [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
[    8.818842]  [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
[    8.818844]  [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
[    8.818846]  [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
[    8.818849]  [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
[    8.818852]  [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
[    8.818855]  [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[    8.818858]  [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
[    8.818860]  [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[    8.818864]  [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
[    8.818867]  [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
[    8.818870]  [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
[    8.818872]  [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
[    8.818874]  [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
[    8.818876]  [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
[    8.818878]  [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
[    8.818880]  [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
[    8.818882]  [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
[    8.818884]  [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
[    8.818887]  [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[    8.818890]  [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
[    8.818893]  [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
[    8.818896]  [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[    8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
[    8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
[    8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6

Regards
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-05  0:18     ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-05-05  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Christian Kujau, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA

Hi

On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2

Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:

[    8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
[    8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
[    8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
[    8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
[    8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[    8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
[    8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
[    8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
[    8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[    8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
[    8.818833] Call Trace:
[    8.818837]  [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
[    8.818839]  [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
[    8.818842]  [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
[    8.818844]  [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
[    8.818846]  [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
[    8.818849]  [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
[    8.818852]  [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
[    8.818855]  [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[    8.818858]  [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
[    8.818860]  [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[    8.818864]  [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
[    8.818867]  [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
[    8.818870]  [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
[    8.818872]  [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
[    8.818874]  [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
[    8.818876]  [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
[    8.818878]  [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
[    8.818880]  [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
[    8.818882]  [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
[    8.818884]  [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
[    8.818887]  [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[    8.818890]  [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
[    8.818893]  [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
[    8.818896]  [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[    8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
[    8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
[    8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6

Regards
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-05-04 20:49 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2010-05-05  0:18     ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20  3:19   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2010-04-30  2:44   ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-04-30  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	Christian Kujau, linux-media, Trent Piepho

Hi

On Friday 30 April 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2

This also continues to be a problem with b2c2-flexcop and 2.6.34-rc5-git10:

[   10.119807] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
[   10.129183] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
[   10.129187] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
[   10.129195] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[   10.129239] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   10.129244] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc5/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
[   10.129246] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
[   10.129247] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
[   10.129248] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) ath9k_common b2c2_flexcop v4l1_compat snd_timer radeon(+) dvb_core ar9170usb(+) ath9k_hw snd_seq_device ir_common tveeprom ttm v4l2_compat_ioctl32 snd drm_kms_helper ir_core ath mac80211 soundcore videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 drm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc videobuf_core cx24113 s5h1420 cfg80211 rfkill evdev i2c_core tpm_tis btcx_risc tpm led_class pcspkr tpm_bios rtc_cmos button rtc_core intel_agp rtc_lib processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd firewire_ohci firewire_core ahci r8169 ehci_hcd mii libata crc_itu_t scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[   10.129279] Pid: 1124, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5-sidux-amd64 #1
[   10.129281] Call Trace:
[   10.129285]  [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
[   10.129287]  [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
[   10.129290]  [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
[   10.129292]  [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
[   10.129294]  [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
[   10.129297]  [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
[   10.129300]  [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
[   10.129303]  [<ffffffffa011b160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[   10.129305]  [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
[   10.129308]  [<ffffffffa011b495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[   10.129312]  [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
[   10.129314]  [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
[   10.129317]  [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
[   10.129320]  [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
[   10.129322]  [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
[   10.129324]  [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
[   10.129326]  [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
[   10.129328]  [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
[   10.129330]  [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
[   10.129332]  [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
[   10.129335]  [<ffffffffa012e000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[   10.129338]  [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
[   10.129341]  [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
[   10.129344]  [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[   10.129345] ---[ end trace 370a62256537c67a ]---
[   10.134144] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
[   10.135610] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6

Regards
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
  (?)
@ 2010-04-21 15:55         ` Alexey Dobriyan
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-21 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
>         return fixed_name;
>  }
>  
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> +       if (!fixed_name) {
> +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> +               return name;
> +       }
> +
> +       p = fixed_name;
> +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> +               *p++ = '_';

This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 15:55         ` Alexey Dobriyan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-21 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
>         return fixed_name;
>  }
>  
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> +       if (!fixed_name) {
> +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> +               return name;
> +       }
> +
> +       p = fixed_name;
> +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> +               *p++ = '_';

This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-21  0:21           ` Michael Ellerman
  (?)
@ 2010-04-21  4:57             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-21  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: michael
  Cc: Alexey Dobriyan, Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> > >         return fixed_name;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> > > +
> > > +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > > +       if (!fixed_name) {
> > > +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > > +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > > +               return name;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       p = fixed_name;
> > > +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > > +               *p++ = '_';
> > 
> > This is wasteful. :-)
> 
> Whatever, patches welcome :)
> 
> > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
> 
> We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
> it or something.

OK

Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off?

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21  4:57             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-21  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: michael
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab,
	Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> > >         return fixed_name;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> > > +
> > > +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > > +       if (!fixed_name) {
> > > +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > > +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > > +               return name;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       p = fixed_name;
> > > +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > > +               *p++ = '_';
> > 
> > This is wasteful. :-)
> 
> Whatever, patches welcome :)
> 
> > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
> 
> We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
> it or something.

OK

Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off?

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21  4:57             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-21  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: michael-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg
  Cc: Alexey Dobriyan, Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
	schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> > >         return fixed_name;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> > > +
> > > +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > > +       if (!fixed_name) {
> > > +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > > +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > > +               return name;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       p = fixed_name;
> > > +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > > +               *p++ = '_';
> > 
> > This is wasteful. :-)
> 
> Whatever, patches welcome :)
> 
> > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.
> 
> We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
> it or something.

OK

Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off?

Rafael

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20 18:15         ` Christian Kujau
  (?)
@ 2010-04-21  0:25           ` Michael Ellerman
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev,
	schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]

On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
> 
> I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
> 
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
> make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2

Yeah oops, told you I hadn't built it.

> And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! 
> New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:
> 
>   http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/

Cool, and we see:

./uni-n@f8000000/i2c@f8001000/i2c-bus@1/fan@5c/pulses_rev

Which is the one that needed fixing.

> Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? 
> I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the 
> warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\

Maybe a little. It has to check every string to see if it contains a
"/". But then you save the cost of taking an exeception for the WARN,
which might make up the difference. But it's a one time fixup at boot,
so it's not going to be noticeable.

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21  0:25           ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev,
	schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]

On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
> 
> I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
> 
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
> make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2

Yeah oops, told you I hadn't built it.

> And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! 
> New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:
> 
>   http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/

Cool, and we see:

./uni-n@f8000000/i2c@f8001000/i2c-bus@1/fan@5c/pulses_rev

Which is the one that needed fixing.

> Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? 
> I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the 
> warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\

Maybe a little. It has to check every string to see if it contains a
"/". But then you save the cost of taking an exeception for the WARN,
which might make up the difference. But it's a one time fixup at boot,
so it's not going to be noticeable.

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21  0:25           ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
	schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
	adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1307 bytes --]

On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
> 
> I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
> 
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
> make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
> make: *** [fs] Error 2

Yeah oops, told you I hadn't built it.

> And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! 
> New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:
> 
>   http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/

Cool, and we see:

./uni-n@f8000000/i2c@f8001000/i2c-bus@1/fan@5c/pulses_rev

Which is the one that needed fixing.

> Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? 
> I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the 
> warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\

Maybe a little. It has to check every string to see if it contains a
"/". But then you save the cost of taking an exeception for the WARN,
which might make up the difference. But it's a one time fixup at boot,
so it's not going to be noticeable.

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-21 15:55         ` Alexey Dobriyan
  (?)
@ 2010-04-21  0:21           ` Michael Ellerman
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21  0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Dobriyan
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --]

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> >         return fixed_name;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > +{
> > +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> > +
> > +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > +       if (!fixed_name) {
> > +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > +               return name;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       p = fixed_name;
> > +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > +               *p++ = '_';
> 
> This is wasteful. :-)

Whatever, patches welcome :)

> Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.

We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
it or something.

The error handling in there is a bit dubious, if the alloc fails we just
return the old name, which we know is bogus. It should probably return
NULL and the calling code can check - same for fixup_name().

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21  0:21           ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21  0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Dobriyan
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --]

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> >         return fixed_name;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > +{
> > +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> > +
> > +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > +       if (!fixed_name) {
> > +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > +               return name;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       p = fixed_name;
> > +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > +               *p++ = '_';
> 
> This is wasteful. :-)

Whatever, patches welcome :)

> Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.

We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
it or something.

The error handling in there is a bit dubious, if the alloc fails we just
return the old name, which we know is bogus. It should probably return
NULL and the calling code can check - same for fixup_name().

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21  0:21           ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-21  0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Dobriyan
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
	schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1265 bytes --]

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
> >         return fixed_name;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> > +{
> > +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> > +
> > +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> > +       if (!fixed_name) {
> > +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> > +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> > +               return name;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       p = fixed_name;
> > +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> > +               *p++ = '_';
> 
> This is wasteful. :-)

Whatever, patches welcome :)

> Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.

We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit
it or something.

The error handling in there is a bit dubious, if the alloc fails we just
return the old name, which we know is bogus. It should probably return
NULL and the calling code can check - same for fixup_name().

cheers

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20 18:15         ` Christian Kujau
  (?)
@ 2010-04-20 20:53           ` Andreas Schwab
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-04-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Michael Ellerman, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> writes:

> +	while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))

You want to use strchr.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 20:53           ` Andreas Schwab
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-04-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev,
	Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> writes:

> +	while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))

You want to use strchr.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 20:53           ` Andreas Schwab
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2010-04-20 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Michael Ellerman, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A, Kernel Testers List,
	adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki

Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org> writes:

> +	while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))

You want to use strchr.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
  (?)
@ 2010-04-20 18:15         ` Christian Kujau
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev,
	schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.

I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:

fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2

And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! 
New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:

  http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/

Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? 
I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the 
warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\


Thanks again,
Christian.

diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
 	return fixed_name;
 }
 
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+	char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+	fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!fixed_name) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+				"name \"%s\"\n", name);
+	return name;
+	}
+
+	p = fixed_name;
+	while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+		*p++ = '_';
+
+	return fixed_name;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
  */
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
 		if (duplicate_name(de, p))
 			p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
 
+		if (strstr(p, "/"))
+			p = unslash_name(p);
+
 		ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
 		if (ent == NULL)
 			break;
-- 
BOFH excuse #369:

Virus transmitted from computer to sysadmins.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 18:15         ` Christian Kujau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev,
	schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.

I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:

fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function =E2=80=98unslash_name=E2=80=99:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function =E2=80=98k=
strdup=E2=80=99
make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2

And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks!=20
New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:

  http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/

Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower?=
=20
I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the=20
warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\


Thanks again,
Christian.

diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
 =09return fixed_name;
 }
=20
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+=09char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+=09fixed_name =3D kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+=09if (!fixed_name) {
+=09=09printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+=09=09=09=09"name \"%s\"\n", name);
+=09return name;
+=09}
+
+=09p =3D fixed_name;
+=09while ((p =3D strstr(p, "/")))
+=09=09*p++ =3D '_';
+
+=09return fixed_name;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
  */
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
 =09=09if (duplicate_name(de, p))
 =09=09=09p =3D fixup_name(np, de, p);
=20
+=09=09if (strstr(p, "/"))
+=09=09=09p =3D unslash_name(p);
+
 =09=09ent =3D __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
 =09=09if (ent =3D=3D NULL)
 =09=09=09break;
--=20
BOFH excuse #369:

Virus transmitted from computer to sysadmins.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 18:15         ` Christian Kujau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
	schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
	adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.

I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:

fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
make[2]: *** [fs/proc/proc_devtree.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [fs/proc] Error 2
make: *** [fs] Error 2

And now 2.6.34-rc5 compiles and boots without the warning. Thanks! 
New dmesg and /proc/device-tree on:

  http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc1/xlate_proc_name/

Alexey mentioned that this is "wasteful" - does it make the kernel slower? 
I have not done any performance tests, but I'd rather stick with the 
warning than make this Powerbook G4 any more slower :-\


Thanks again,
Christian.

diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index ce94801..019581d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -176,6 +176,24 @@ retry:
 	return fixed_name;
 }
 
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+	char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+	fixed_name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!fixed_name) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+				"name \"%s\"\n", name);
+	return name;
+	}
+
+	p = fixed_name;
+	while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+		*p++ = '_';
+
+	return fixed_name;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
  */
@@ -212,6 +230,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
 		if (duplicate_name(de, p))
 			p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
 
+		if (strstr(p, "/"))
+			p = unslash_name(p);
+
 		ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
 		if (ent == NULL)
 			break;
-- 
BOFH excuse #369:

Virus transmitted from computer to sysadmins.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
                         ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-04-20 15:55       ` Alexey Dobriyan
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
>         return fixed_name;
>  }
>  
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> +       if (!fixed_name) {
> +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> +               return name;
> +       }
> +
> +       p = fixed_name;
> +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> +               *p++ = '_';

This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
                         ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2010-04-20 15:55       ` Alexey Dobriyan
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki,
	linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
>         return fixed_name;
>  }
>  
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> +       if (!fixed_name) {
> +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> +               return name;
> +       }
> +
> +       p = fixed_name;
> +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> +               *p++ = '_';

This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2010-04-20 15:55       ` Alexey Dobriyan
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev, schwab, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
>         return fixed_name;
>  }
>  
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> +       if (!fixed_name) {
> +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> +               return name;
> +       }
> +
> +       p = fixed_name;
> +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> +               *p++ = '_';

This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-21 15:55         ` Alexey Dobriyan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2010-04-20 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Christian Kujau, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
	schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
	Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
>         return fixed_name;
>  }
>  
> +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
> +{
> +       char *p, *fixed_name;
> +
> +       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
> +       if (!fixed_name) {
> +               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
> +                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
> +               return name;
> +       }
> +
> +       p = fixed_name;
> +       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
> +               *p++ = '_';

This is wasteful. :-)
Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20  6:45     ` Christian Kujau
  (?)
@ 2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev,
	schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> 
> Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is 
> still printed during boot:
> 
> 
> device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
> name 'pulses/rev'
> ------------[ cut here ]------------

Don't cut here, sigh.

> Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317

Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.

cheers


diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index f8650dc..9502b48 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
        return fixed_name;
 }
 
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+       char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
+       if (!fixed_name) {
+               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+               return name;
+       }
+
+       p = fixed_name;
+       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+               *p++ = '_';
+
+       return fixed_name;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
  */
@@ -211,6 +229,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
                if (duplicate_name(de, p))
                        p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
 
+               if (strstr(p, "/"))
+                       p = unslash_name(p);
+
                ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
                if (ent == NULL)
                        break;



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Rafael J. Wysocki, linuxppc-dev,
	schwab, Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> 
> Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is 
> still printed during boot:
> 
> 
> device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
> name 'pulses/rev'
> ------------[ cut here ]------------

Don't cut here, sigh.

> Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317

Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.

cheers


diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index f8650dc..9502b48 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
        return fixed_name;
 }
 
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+       char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
+       if (!fixed_name) {
+               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+               return name;
+       }
+
+       p = fixed_name;
+       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+               *p++ = '_';
+
+       return fixed_name;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
  */
@@ -211,6 +229,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
                if (duplicate_name(de, p))
                        p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
 
+               if (strstr(p, "/"))
+                       p = unslash_name(p);
+
                ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
                if (ent == NULL)
                        break;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2010-04-20 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian Kujau
  Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
	schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g, Kernel Testers List,
	adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, Maciej Rutecki

On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> > Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
> 
> Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is 
> still printed during boot:
> 
> 
> device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
> name 'pulses/rev'
> ------------[ cut here ]------------

Don't cut here, sigh.

> Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317

Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.

cheers


diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index f8650dc..9502b48 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
        return fixed_name;
 }
 
+static const char *unslash_name(const char *name)
+{
+       char *p, *fixed_name;
+
+       fixed_name = kstrdup(name);
+       if (!fixed_name) {
+               printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash "
+                               "name \"%s\"\n", name);
+               return name;
+       }
+
+       p = fixed_name;
+       while ((p = strstr(p, "/")))
+               *p++ = '_';
+
+       return fixed_name;
+}
+
 /*
  * Process a node, adding entries for its children and its properties.
  */
@@ -211,6 +229,9 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
                if (duplicate_name(de, p))
                        p = fixup_name(np, de, p);
 
+               if (strstr(p, "/"))
+                       p = unslash_name(p);
+
                ent = __proc_device_tree_add_prop(de, pp, p);
                if (ent == NULL)
                        break;


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20  3:19   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  (?)
@ 2010-04-20  6:45     ` Christian Kujau
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20  6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	adobriyan, linuxppc-dev, benh, schwab

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2

Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is 
still printed during boot:


device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
name 'pulses/rev'
------------[ cut here ]------------
Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317
NIP: c00e14b8 LR: c00e14b8 CTR: c01fc2c0
REGS: c045bdc0 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (2.6.34-rc4)
MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR>  CR: 22000022  XER: 20000000
TASK = c043b410[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c045a000
GPR00: c00e14b8 c045be70 c043b410 00000024 000012ff ffffffff ffffffff 00000000 
GPR08: ef808320 c0458670 00000000 000012ff 42000028 00000000 00cb3ccc 00cb39b8 
GPR16: 00cd682c 00cb3ca8 00cb38c8 00cb39ac 00240e18 00240e20 00cb3954 00240e24 
GPR24: 00000000 0049b000 c045be98 c045bec8 c0da0a42 c0da0a42 00000006 00000000 
NIP [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
LR [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
Call Trace:
[c045be70] [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 (unreliable)
[c045be90] [c00e1a2c] __proc_create+0x60/0xf0
[c045bec0] [c00e2194] proc_create_data+0x54/0xc4
[c045bee0] [c00e6310] __proc_device_tree_add_prop+0x64/0xd4
[c045bf00] [c00e64b4] proc_device_tree_add_node+0x134/0x164
[c045bf20] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf40] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf60] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf80] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bfa0] [c0421c30] proc_device_tree_init+0x4c/0x78
[c045bfb0] [c0421698] proc_root_init+0xcc/0xf0
[c045bfc0] [c040e798] start_kernel+0x230/0x284
[c045bff0] [00003444] 0x3444
Instruction dump:
93ba0000 38600000 93fb0000 80010024 bb410008 38210020 7c0803a6 4e800020 
3c60c03c 7f84e378 386300a8 48273a45 <0fe00000> 80010024 3860fffe bb410008 


-- 
BOFH excuse #37:

heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20  6:45     ` Christian Kujau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20  6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev, schwab,
	Kernel Testers List, adobriyan, Maciej Rutecki

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2

Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is 
still printed during boot:


device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
name 'pulses/rev'
------------[ cut here ]------------
Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317
NIP: c00e14b8 LR: c00e14b8 CTR: c01fc2c0
REGS: c045bdc0 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (2.6.34-rc4)
MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR>  CR: 22000022  XER: 20000000
TASK = c043b410[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c045a000
GPR00: c00e14b8 c045be70 c043b410 00000024 000012ff ffffffff ffffffff 00000000 
GPR08: ef808320 c0458670 00000000 000012ff 42000028 00000000 00cb3ccc 00cb39b8 
GPR16: 00cd682c 00cb3ca8 00cb38c8 00cb39ac 00240e18 00240e20 00cb3954 00240e24 
GPR24: 00000000 0049b000 c045be98 c045bec8 c0da0a42 c0da0a42 00000006 00000000 
NIP [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
LR [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
Call Trace:
[c045be70] [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 (unreliable)
[c045be90] [c00e1a2c] __proc_create+0x60/0xf0
[c045bec0] [c00e2194] proc_create_data+0x54/0xc4
[c045bee0] [c00e6310] __proc_device_tree_add_prop+0x64/0xd4
[c045bf00] [c00e64b4] proc_device_tree_add_node+0x134/0x164
[c045bf20] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf40] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf60] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf80] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bfa0] [c0421c30] proc_device_tree_init+0x4c/0x78
[c045bfb0] [c0421698] proc_root_init+0xcc/0xf0
[c045bfc0] [c040e798] start_kernel+0x230/0x284
[c045bff0] [00003444] 0x3444
Instruction dump:
93ba0000 38600000 93fb0000 80010024 bb410008 38210020 7c0803a6 4e800020 
3c60c03c 7f84e378 386300a8 48273a45 <0fe00000> 80010024 3860fffe bb410008 


-- 
BOFH excuse #37:

heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20  6:45     ` Christian Kujau
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Christian Kujau @ 2010-04-20  6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
	adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A,
	benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r,
	schwab-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
> Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2

Yes, unless something in this area has changed from -rc4 to -rc5, this is 
still printed during boot:


device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"
name 'pulses/rev'
------------[ cut here ]------------
Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:317
NIP: c00e14b8 LR: c00e14b8 CTR: c01fc2c0
REGS: c045bdc0 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (2.6.34-rc4)
MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR>  CR: 22000022  XER: 20000000
TASK = c043b410[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c045a000
GPR00: c00e14b8 c045be70 c043b410 00000024 000012ff ffffffff ffffffff 00000000 
GPR08: ef808320 c0458670 00000000 000012ff 42000028 00000000 00cb3ccc 00cb39b8 
GPR16: 00cd682c 00cb3ca8 00cb38c8 00cb39ac 00240e18 00240e20 00cb3954 00240e24 
GPR24: 00000000 0049b000 c045be98 c045bec8 c0da0a42 c0da0a42 00000006 00000000 
NIP [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
LR [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8
Call Trace:
[c045be70] [c00e14b8] __xlate_proc_name+0xd0/0xf8 (unreliable)
[c045be90] [c00e1a2c] __proc_create+0x60/0xf0
[c045bec0] [c00e2194] proc_create_data+0x54/0xc4
[c045bee0] [c00e6310] __proc_device_tree_add_prop+0x64/0xd4
[c045bf00] [c00e64b4] proc_device_tree_add_node+0x134/0x164
[c045bf20] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf40] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf60] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bf80] [c00e6434] proc_device_tree_add_node+0xb4/0x164
[c045bfa0] [c0421c30] proc_device_tree_init+0x4c/0x78
[c045bfb0] [c0421698] proc_root_init+0xcc/0xf0
[c045bfc0] [c040e798] start_kernel+0x230/0x284
[c045bff0] [00003444] 0x3444
Instruction dump:
93ba0000 38600000 93fb0000 80010024 bb410008 38210020 7c0803a6 4e800020 
3c60c03c 7f84e378 386300a8 48273a45 <0fe00000> 80010024 3860fffe bb410008 


-- 
BOFH excuse #37:

heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-20  3:15 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-20  3:19   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-20  3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-04-20  3:19   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-20  3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
  2010-04-07 21:08 2.6.34-rc3-git6: " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 95+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
  Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau

This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.

The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).


Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject		: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter	: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date		: 2010-03-13 23:53 (26 days old)
Message-ID	: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 95+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-26  1:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-21 19:58 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 19:59 ` [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15505] No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15495] Flood of SELinux denials on polkitd Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15496] 2.6.34-rc1 crashes early while startup Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-24 19:29   ` Thomas Meyer
2010-03-24 19:29     ` Thomas Meyer
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15549] [2.6.34-rc1][libata] regression? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15537] 2.6.34-rc1 hangs for 30 seconds when trying to access the disk Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15548] BUG: key f70f4b50 not in .data Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15518] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-24 17:00   ` Daniel Vetter
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15533] i915 fails to set mode in 2.6.34-rc1, ok in 2.6.33-rc8 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15555] 2.6.34-rc1: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:2989! Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-26  6:13   ` Américo Wang
2010-03-26 21:59     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-26 21:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-21 20:13 ` [Bug #15584] 2.6.34-rc1: lockdep warning on geode subnotebook Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-22 13:57 ` 2.6.34-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 John W. Linville
2010-03-22 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-22 17:12   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-22 21:20   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-22 21:20   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-07 21:08 2.6.34-rc3-git6: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20  3:15 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20  3:19 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20  3:19   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20  6:45   ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20  6:45     ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20  6:45     ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 12:18     ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-20 12:18       ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-20 15:55       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-20 15:55       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-20 15:55       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-20 18:15       ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 18:15         ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 18:15         ` Christian Kujau
2010-04-20 20:53         ` Andreas Schwab
2010-04-20 20:53           ` Andreas Schwab
2010-04-20 20:53           ` Andreas Schwab
2010-04-21  0:25         ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21  0:25           ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21  0:25           ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21 15:55       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-20 15:54         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-21 15:55         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-04-21  0:21         ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21  0:21           ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21  0:21           ` Michael Ellerman
2010-04-21  4:57           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-21  4:57             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-21  4:57             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-30  2:44   ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-05-04 20:49 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05  0:18   ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-05-05  0:18     ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-05-05  0:23     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05  0:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-09 21:13 2.6.34-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-09 21:17 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-09 21:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-09 22:27   ` Christian Kujau
2010-05-09 22:27     ` Christian Kujau
2010-05-09 22:27     ` Christian Kujau
2010-05-09 23:34     ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-09 23:34       ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-09 23:34       ` Michael Ellerman
2010-06-13 14:45 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-13 14:45 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-13 14:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-13 15:22   ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-06-13 15:22     ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-06-13 18:10     ` Christian Kujau
2010-06-13 18:10       ` Christian Kujau
2010-06-13 19:57       ` Grant Likely
2010-06-13 19:57         ` Grant Likely
2010-06-14  6:39         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-06-14  6:39           ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-06-14 12:27           ` Jindrich Makovicka
2010-06-14 12:27             ` Jindrich Makovicka
2010-06-14 15:42           ` Grant Likely
2010-06-14 15:42             ` Grant Likely
2010-06-20 22:32 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:32 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-20 22:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 22:19   ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-06-21 22:43     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-21 22:43       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-26  1:04   ` Christian Kujau

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.