From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73786C433ED for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396E0613B5 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230498AbhEFCKU (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 22:10:20 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:17466 "EHLO szxga05-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229488AbhEFCKS (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 22:10:18 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FbH510mBPzkWpY; Thu, 6 May 2021 10:06:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.110.154] (10.136.110.154) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 6 May 2021 10:09:18 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: set file as cold when file defragmentation To: , "jaegeuk@kernel.org" , "chao@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" References: <20210429062005epcms2p352ef77f96ab66cbffe0c0ab6c1b62d8a@epcms2p3> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <3a0ab201-9546-d523-abc7-79df5f637f14@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 10:09:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210429062005epcms2p352ef77f96ab66cbffe0c0ab6c1b62d8a@epcms2p3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.136.110.154] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/4/29 14:20, Daejun Park wrote: > In file defragmentation by ioctl, all data blocks in the file are > re-written out-of-place. File defragmentation implies user will not update > and mostly read the file. So before the defragmentation, we set file > temperature as cold for better block allocation. I don't think all fragmented files are cold, e.g. db file. We have separated interface (via f2fs_xattr_advise_handler, e.g. setfattr -n "system.advise" -v value) to indicate this file is a hot/cold file, so my suggestion is after file defragmentation, if you think this file is cold, and use setxattr() to set it as cold. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Daejun Park > --- > fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > index d697c8900fa7..dcac965a05fe 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > @@ -2669,6 +2669,9 @@ static int f2fs_defragment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > map.m_len = pg_end - pg_start; > total = 0; > > + if (!file_is_cold(inode)) > + file_set_cold(inode); > + > while (map.m_lblk < pg_end) { > pgoff_t idx; > int cnt = 0; > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D05C433ED for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4263F613B5 for ; Thu, 6 May 2021 02:09:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4263F613B5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leTSJ-0006kB-CA; Thu, 06 May 2021 02:09:35 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leTSH-0006js-VB for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 May 2021 02:09:33 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=imtkCkkG8FHkAGkMw04nanvHQ849et1kWazFQq0qZng=; b=gASNRa44Z8R8t9vR0WzOeGhdlY Xe5aobEtnhwe1sutyusVX3cdY1DvKy2JYFZvOifgmvVPKYaPyTk2nDwqs9BNvDDqL06eXQy7sgjOI IC/A3hhE/CaBEJxeBYXqufLUMRZA6/mYpyCtl+zSFzkKc8aISLekLDM03lYp+Rfm0H8s=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=imtkCkkG8FHkAGkMw04nanvHQ849et1kWazFQq0qZng=; b=X8hTKZYSjeEskO8ela/8m2YRgM 1aiifdVn2jks0OwEstwAT2V1nXB6692ycNeqce2T00b8H5JhtW98lo8Zkn9aOPhnCm0uSUaNGqoSs o0Jw/4PytG299xLgk+DyvwsItNQjeAoZoI9gmn+l5fB/2pQgyyP/o6ZTCeFTi2rGMzqE=; Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1leTSC-0033wm-T6 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 May 2021 02:09:34 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FbH510mBPzkWpY; Thu, 6 May 2021 10:06:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.110.154] (10.136.110.154) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 6 May 2021 10:09:18 +0800 To: , "jaegeuk@kernel.org" , "chao@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" References: <20210429062005epcms2p352ef77f96ab66cbffe0c0ab6c1b62d8a@epcms2p3> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <3a0ab201-9546-d523-abc7-79df5f637f14@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 10:09:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210429062005epcms2p352ef77f96ab66cbffe0c0ab6c1b62d8a@epcms2p3> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.136.110.154] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1leTSC-0033wm-T6 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: set file as cold when file defragmentation X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2021/4/29 14:20, Daejun Park wrote: > In file defragmentation by ioctl, all data blocks in the file are > re-written out-of-place. File defragmentation implies user will not update > and mostly read the file. So before the defragmentation, we set file > temperature as cold for better block allocation. I don't think all fragmented files are cold, e.g. db file. We have separated interface (via f2fs_xattr_advise_handler, e.g. setfattr -n "system.advise" -v value) to indicate this file is a hot/cold file, so my suggestion is after file defragmentation, if you think this file is cold, and use setxattr() to set it as cold. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Daejun Park > --- > fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > index d697c8900fa7..dcac965a05fe 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > @@ -2669,6 +2669,9 @@ static int f2fs_defragment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > map.m_len = pg_end - pg_start; > total = 0; > > + if (!file_is_cold(inode)) > + file_set_cold(inode); > + > while (map.m_lblk < pg_end) { > pgoff_t idx; > int cnt = 0; > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel