From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A3974D38 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 14:20:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jun 2018 07:20:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,467,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="59556366" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2018 07:20:34 -0700 To: Matt Hoosier , bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20180525134537.27659-1-matt.hoosier@gmail.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <3a26a73a-5344-d921-0aeb-cebf7de38b52@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 17:20:50 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] fetch/gitsm: avoid live submodule fetching during unpack() X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 14:20:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/01/2018 05:02 PM, Matt Hoosier wrote: > I was just wondering what the expected procedure is here among the > bitbake devs. Should I be contacting the specific people that have > historically been the committers for the particular code affected by the > change? Ross is on holiday this week, so some patience is advised. Alex