All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] net: tun: fix tun_xdp_one() for IFF_TUN mode
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 11:43:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a47986a65825121e67ccf831d0b9938862a6e36.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8914d56f-8059-71df-ab51-9fbb9637e45a@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 697 bytes --]

On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 12:27 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > If we're going to continue to *not* check on the XDP path, we similarly
> > need a proof that it can't be fragmented. And also a reason to bother
> > with the "optimisation", of course.
> 
> 
> For XDP path, we simply need to add a length check since the packet is 
> always a linear memory.

Sure, but in that case skb_headlen is going to be enough to cover
ETH_HLEN, and that's the very first thing that the standard inline
version of pskb_may_pull() checks, without ever even having to make an
out-of-line call.

So there's just no reason ever for us *not* to keep it really simple,
and use pskb_may_pull() in all cases.

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5174 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-28 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-19 13:33 [PATCH] net: tun: fix tun_xdp_one() for IFF_TUN mode David Woodhouse
2021-06-21  7:00 ` Jason Wang
2021-06-21 10:52   ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-21 14:50     ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-21 20:43       ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-22  4:52         ` Jason Wang
2021-06-22  7:24           ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-22  7:51             ` Jason Wang
2021-06-22  8:10               ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-22 11:36               ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-22  4:34       ` Jason Wang
2021-06-22  4:34     ` Jason Wang
2021-06-22  7:28       ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-22  8:00         ` Jason Wang
2021-06-22  8:29           ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-23  3:39             ` Jason Wang
2021-06-24 12:39               ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-22 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] " David Woodhouse
2021-06-22 16:15   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] net: tun: don't assume IFF_VNET_HDR in tun_xdp_one() tx path David Woodhouse
2021-06-23  3:46     ` Jason Wang
2021-06-22 16:15   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] vhost_net: validate virtio_net_hdr only if it exists David Woodhouse
2021-06-23  3:48     ` Jason Wang
2021-06-22 16:15   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] vhost_net: Add self test with tun device David Woodhouse
2021-06-23  4:02     ` Jason Wang
2021-06-23 16:12       ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-24  6:12         ` Jason Wang
2021-06-24 10:42           ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-25  2:55             ` Jason Wang
2021-06-25  7:54               ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-23  3:45   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] net: tun: fix tun_xdp_one() for IFF_TUN mode Jason Wang
2021-06-23  8:30     ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-23 13:52     ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-23 17:31       ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-23 22:52         ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-24  6:37           ` Jason Wang
2021-06-24  7:23             ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-24  6:18       ` Jason Wang
2021-06-24  7:05         ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-24 12:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] net: add header len parameter to tun_get_socket(), tap_get_socket() David Woodhouse
2021-06-24 12:30   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] net: tun: don't assume IFF_VNET_HDR in tun_xdp_one() tx path David Woodhouse
2021-06-25  6:58     ` Jason Wang
2021-06-24 12:30   ` [PATCH v3 3/5] vhost_net: remove virtio_net_hdr validation, let tun/tap do it themselves David Woodhouse
2021-06-25  7:33     ` Jason Wang
2021-06-25  8:37       ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-28  4:23         ` Jason Wang
2021-06-28 11:23           ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-28 23:29             ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-29  3:43               ` Jason Wang
2021-06-29  6:59                 ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-29 10:49                 ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-29 13:15                   ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-30  4:39                   ` Jason Wang
2021-06-30 10:02                     ` David Woodhouse
2021-07-01  4:13                       ` Jason Wang
2021-07-01 17:39                         ` David Woodhouse
2021-07-02  3:13                           ` Jason Wang
2021-07-02  8:08                             ` David Woodhouse
2021-07-02  8:50                               ` Jason Wang
2021-07-09 15:04                               ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2021-06-29  3:21             ` Jason Wang
2021-06-24 12:30   ` [PATCH v3 4/5] net: tun: fix tun_xdp_one() for IFF_TUN mode David Woodhouse
2021-06-25  7:41     ` Jason Wang
2021-06-25  8:51       ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-28  4:27         ` Jason Wang
2021-06-28 10:43           ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2021-06-25 18:43     ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-06-25 19:00       ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-24 12:30   ` [PATCH v3 5/5] vhost_net: Add self test with tun device David Woodhouse
2021-06-25  5:00   ` [PATCH v3 1/5] net: add header len parameter to tun_get_socket(), tap_get_socket() Jason Wang
2021-06-25  8:23     ` David Woodhouse
2021-06-28  4:22       ` Jason Wang
2021-06-25 18:13   ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-06-25 18:55     ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3a47986a65825121e67ccf831d0b9938862a6e36.camel@infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.