From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABF8C32771 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 01:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91737206B7 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 01:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fnarfbargle.com header.i=@fnarfbargle.com header.b="yXXRc9zh" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727104AbgASB7V (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:59:21 -0500 Received: from ns3.fnarfbargle.com ([103.4.19.87]:35646 "EHLO ns3.fnarfbargle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727083AbgASB7V (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:59:21 -0500 Received: from [10.8.0.1] (helo=srv.home ident=heh27698) by ns3.fnarfbargle.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iszri-0001Dx-Ni; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 09:59:02 +0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fnarfbargle.com; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject; bh=IcoeF8ZKL8q7zcbyW8LQy/2+4jjbmV9Gw23mNx+sFLc=; b=yXXRc9zhAd80mR37sYLqbLcYyHF+k0MwgvB+aYykw+1rFlrJML8J2rq35QCInTFxofgRoCc/cLtqUPlLfMabLrX7f6X0I+WHDa0p5ke9vpI2mAs3lDxmjczs63nWDvtbL2+x96+u7eTDKDLZw0EutkIOl7MFGnskLOECvU/iGoU=; Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 0/4] hwmon: k10temp driver improvements To: Guenter Roeck , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org Cc: Clemens Ladisch , Jean Delvare , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200116141800.9828-1-linux@roeck-us.net> <492345ed-f82e-e4d9-20ac-924b4a00df90@fnarfbargle.com> <6bb6770d-cfb0-1209-6c8f-f89c5dc4fa7f@roeck-us.net> From: Brad Campbell Message-ID: <3a6068a1-3504-26e0-d1e6-947eae287a29@fnarfbargle.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 09:59:01 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6bb6770d-cfb0-1209-6c8f-f89c5dc4fa7f@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-AU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org On 19/1/20 1:14 am, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 1/18/20 12:52 AM, Brad Campbell wrote: >> On 16/1/20 10:17 pm, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> This patch series implements various improvements for the k10temp >>> driver. >>> >> >> Looks good here. Identical motherboards (ASUS x370 Prime-Pro), >> different CPUs. >> >> 3950x >> > Interesting. I thought the 3950X needs a newer motherboard. This board has the 3950x listed on the compatibility matrix, so I took the punt. I am running a beta BIOS with the 1.0.0.4 AGESA but it's running in a stock production environment and has been stable. I don't overclock or game, it's predominantly a VM host. > Is that CPU as amazing as everyone says it is ? It is fairly impressive and a significant update over the 1800x it replaced. Kernel compiles are pretty quick :) > And does it really need liquid cooling ? No. I'm using a stock AMD Wraith Prism cooler in a 4U rack case. It might reach higher boost clocks with better cooling, but under an all-core load I still see > 4.1GHz across all cores. Regards, Brad