All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
To: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] crypto/scheduler: add fail-over scheduling mode file
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:57:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3addd0f7-c047-ded4-d848-345d870530c6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490274162-85053-2-git-send-email-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>

On 23/03/17 13:02, Fan Zhang wrote:
> This patch adds the fail-over scheduling mode main source file.
>

A little bit of detail on how the fail over scheduling will work would 
be good in the commit comment.


> Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_failover.c | 324 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 324 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_failover.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_failover.c b/drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_failover.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..58c8302
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/scheduler/scheduler_failover.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
> +/*-
> + *   BSD LICENSE
> + *
> + *   Copyright(c) 2017 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + *   Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> + *   modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> + *   are met:
> + *
> + *     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> + *       notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> + *     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> + *       notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> + *       the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> + *       distribution.
> + *     * Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
> + *       contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
> + *       from this software without specific prior written permission.
> + *
> + *   THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> + *   "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> + *   LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
> + *   A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
> + *   OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> + *   SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> + *   LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
> + *   DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
> + *   THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> + *   (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> + *   OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> + */
> +
> +#include <rte_cryptodev.h>
> +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> +
> +#include "rte_cryptodev_scheduler_operations.h"
> +#include "scheduler_pmd_private.h"
> +
> +#define PRIMARY_SLAVE_IDX	0
> +#define SECONDARY_SLAVE_IDX	1
> +#define NB_FAILOVER_SLAVES	2
> +#define SLAVE_SWITCH_MASK	(0x01)
> +
> +struct fo_scheduler_qp_ctx {
> +	struct scheduler_slave primary_slave;
> +	struct scheduler_slave secondary_slave;
> +
> +	uint8_t deq_idx;
> +};
> +
> +static inline uint16_t __attribute__((always_inline))
> +failover_slave_enqueue(struct scheduler_slave *slave, uint8_t slave_idx,
> +		struct rte_crypto_op **ops, uint16_t nb_ops)
> +{
> +	uint16_t i, processed_ops;
> +	struct rte_cryptodev_sym_session *sessions[nb_ops];
> +	struct scheduler_session *sess0, *sess1, *sess2, *sess3;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nb_ops && i < 4; i++)
> +		rte_prefetch0(ops[i]->sym->session);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; (i < (nb_ops - 8)) && (nb_ops > 8); i += 4) {
> +		rte_prefetch0(ops[i + 4]->sym->session);
> +		rte_prefetch0(ops[i + 5]->sym->session);
> +		rte_prefetch0(ops[i + 6]->sym->session);
> +		rte_prefetch0(ops[i + 7]->sym->session);
> +
> +		sess0 = (struct scheduler_session *)
> +				ops[i]->sym->session->_private;
> +		sess1 = (struct scheduler_session *)
> +				ops[i+1]->sym->session->_private;
> +		sess2 = (struct scheduler_session *)
> +				ops[i+2]->sym->session->_private;
> +		sess3 = (struct scheduler_session *)
> +				ops[i+3]->sym->session->_private;
> +
> +		sessions[i] = ops[i]->sym->session;
> +		sessions[i + 1] = ops[i + 1]->sym->session;
> +		sessions[i + 2] = ops[i + 2]->sym->session;
> +		sessions[i + 3] = ops[i + 3]->sym->session;
> +
> +		ops[i]->sym->session = sess0->sessions[slave_idx];
> +		ops[i + 1]->sym->session = sess1->sessions[slave_idx];
> +		ops[i + 2]->sym->session = sess2->sessions[slave_idx];
> +		ops[i + 3]->sym->session = sess3->sessions[slave_idx];
> +	}
> +
> +	for (; i < nb_ops; i++) {
> +		sess0 = (struct scheduler_session *)
> +				ops[i]->sym->session->_private;
> +		sessions[i] = ops[i]->sym->session;
> +		ops[i]->sym->session = sess0->sessions[slave_idx];
> +	}
> +
> +	processed_ops = rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(slave->dev_id,
> +			slave->qp_id, ops, nb_ops);
> +	slave->nb_inflight_cops += processed_ops;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(processed_ops < nb_ops))
> +		for (i = processed_ops; i < nb_ops; i++)
> +			ops[i]->sym->session = sessions[i];
> +
> +	return processed_ops;
> +}
> +
> +static uint16_t
> +schedule_enqueue(void *qp, struct rte_crypto_op **ops, uint16_t nb_ops)
> +{
> +	struct fo_scheduler_qp_ctx *qp_ctx =
> +			((struct scheduler_qp_ctx *)qp)->private_qp_ctx;
> +	uint16_t enqueued_ops;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(nb_ops == 0))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	enqueued_ops = failover_slave_enqueue(&qp_ctx->primary_slave,
> +			PRIMARY_SLAVE_IDX, ops, nb_ops);
> +
> +	if (enqueued_ops < nb_ops)
> +		enqueued_ops += failover_slave_enqueue(&qp_ctx->secondary_slave,
> +				SECONDARY_SLAVE_IDX, &ops[enqueued_ops],
> +				nb_ops - enqueued_ops);
> +
> +	return enqueued_ops;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static uint16_t
> +schedule_enqueue_ordering(void *qp, struct rte_crypto_op **ops,
> +		uint16_t nb_ops)
> +{
> +	struct rte_ring *order_ring =
> +			((struct scheduler_qp_ctx *)qp)->order_ring;
> +	uint16_t nb_ops_to_enq = get_max_enqueue_order_count(order_ring,
> +			nb_ops);
> +	uint16_t nb_ops_enqd = schedule_enqueue(qp, ops,
> +			nb_ops_to_enq);
> +
> +	scheduler_order_insert(order_ring, ops, nb_ops_enqd);
> +
> +	return nb_ops_enqd;
> +}
> +
> +static uint16_t
> +schedule_dequeue(void *qp, struct rte_crypto_op **ops, uint16_t nb_ops)
> +{
> +	struct fo_scheduler_qp_ctx *qp_ctx =
> +			((struct scheduler_qp_ctx *)qp)->private_qp_ctx;
> +	struct scheduler_slave *slaves[NB_FAILOVER_SLAVES] = {
> +			&qp_ctx->primary_slave, &qp_ctx->secondary_slave};
> +	struct scheduler_slave *slave = slaves[qp_ctx->deq_idx];
> +	uint16_t nb_deq_ops = 0, nb_deq_ops2 = 0;
> +
> +	if (slave->nb_inflight_cops) {
> +		nb_deq_ops = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(slave->dev_id,
> +			slave->qp_id, ops, nb_ops);
> +		slave->nb_inflight_cops -= nb_deq_ops;
> +
> +		/* force a flush */
> +		if (unlikely(nb_deq_ops == 0))
> +			rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(slave->dev_id, slave->qp_id,
> +					NULL, 0);

I don't think the flush logic should be within the scheduler, it should 
be left up to the application as whether it is needed is dependent on 
the PMDs being used.

> +	}
> +
> +	qp_ctx->deq_idx = (~qp_ctx->deq_idx) & SLAVE_SWITCH_MASK;
> +
> +	if (nb_deq_ops == nb_ops)
> +		return nb_deq_ops;
> +
> +	slave = slaves[qp_ctx->deq_idx];
> +
> +	if (slave->nb_inflight_cops) {
> +		nb_deq_ops2 = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(slave->dev_id,
> +			slave->qp_id, &ops[nb_deq_ops], nb_ops - nb_deq_ops);
> +		slave->nb_inflight_cops -= nb_deq_ops2;
> +
> +		/* force a flush */
> +		if (unlikely(nb_deq_ops == 0))
> +			rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(slave->dev_id, slave->qp_id,
> +					NULL, 0);
> +	}
> +
> +	return nb_deq_ops + nb_deq_ops2;
> +}
> +
> +static uint16_t
> +schedule_dequeue_ordering(void *qp, struct rte_crypto_op **ops,
> +		uint16_t nb_ops)
> +{
> +	struct rte_ring *order_ring =
> +			((struct scheduler_qp_ctx *)qp)->order_ring;
> +	struct fo_scheduler_qp_ctx *qp_ctx =
> +			((struct scheduler_qp_ctx *)qp)->private_qp_ctx;
> +	uint16_t nb_deq_ops = 0;
> +
> +	if (qp_ctx->primary_slave.nb_inflight_cops) {
> +		nb_deq_ops = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(
> +				qp_ctx->primary_slave.dev_id,
> +				qp_ctx->primary_slave.qp_id, ops, nb_ops);
> +		qp_ctx->primary_slave.nb_inflight_cops -= nb_deq_ops;
> +
> +		/* force a flush */
> +		if (unlikely(nb_deq_ops == 0))
> +			rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(
> +					qp_ctx->primary_slave.dev_id,
> +					qp_ctx->primary_slave.qp_id,
> +					NULL, 0);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (qp_ctx->secondary_slave.nb_inflight_cops) {
> +		nb_deq_ops = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(
> +				qp_ctx->secondary_slave.dev_id,
> +				qp_ctx->secondary_slave.qp_id, ops, nb_ops);
> +		qp_ctx->secondary_slave.nb_inflight_cops -= nb_deq_ops;
> +
> +		/* force a flush */
> +		if (unlikely(nb_deq_ops == 0))
> +			rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(
> +					qp_ctx->secondary_slave.dev_id,
> +					qp_ctx->secondary_slave.qp_id,
> +					NULL, 0);
> +	}

I think we should just use the schedule_dequeue function above, I know 
it will limit the total operations dequeue from both slaves but this may 
be preferable behavior, as we could could be spending may more cycles 
that we need dequeuing extra operations in slaves than are needed in the 
reorder ring.

> +
> +	return scheduler_order_drain(order_ring, ops, nb_ops);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +slave_attach(__rte_unused struct rte_cryptodev *dev,
> +		__rte_unused uint8_t slave_id)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +slave_detach(__rte_unused struct rte_cryptodev *dev,
> +		__rte_unused uint8_t slave_id)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +scheduler_start(struct rte_cryptodev *dev)
> +{
> +	struct scheduler_ctx *sched_ctx = dev->data->dev_private;
> +	uint16_t i;
> +
> +	if (sched_ctx->nb_slaves < 2) {
> +		CS_LOG_ERR("Number of slaves shall no less than 2");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (sched_ctx->reordering_enabled) {
> +		dev->enqueue_burst = schedule_enqueue_ordering;
> +		dev->dequeue_burst = schedule_dequeue_ordering;
> +	} else {
> +		dev->enqueue_burst = schedule_enqueue;
> +		dev->dequeue_burst = schedule_dequeue;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_queue_pairs; i++) {
> +		struct fo_scheduler_qp_ctx *qp_ctx =
> +			((struct scheduler_qp_ctx *)
> +				dev->data->queue_pairs[i])->private_qp_ctx;
> +
> +		rte_memcpy(&qp_ctx->primary_slave,
> +				&sched_ctx->slaves[PRIMARY_SLAVE_IDX],
> +				sizeof(struct scheduler_slave));
> +		rte_memcpy(&qp_ctx->secondary_slave,
> +				&sched_ctx->slaves[SECONDARY_SLAVE_IDX],
> +				sizeof(struct scheduler_slave));
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +scheduler_stop(__rte_unused struct rte_cryptodev *dev)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +scheduler_config_qp(struct rte_cryptodev *dev, uint16_t qp_id)
> +{
> +	struct scheduler_qp_ctx *qp_ctx = dev->data->queue_pairs[qp_id];
> +	struct fo_scheduler_qp_ctx *fo_qp_ctx;
> +
> +	fo_qp_ctx = rte_zmalloc_socket(NULL, sizeof(*fo_qp_ctx), 0,
> +			rte_socket_id());
> +	if (!fo_qp_ctx) {
> +		CS_LOG_ERR("failed allocate memory for private queue pair");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	qp_ctx->private_qp_ctx = (void *)fo_qp_ctx;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +scheduler_create_private_ctx(__rte_unused struct rte_cryptodev *dev)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct rte_cryptodev_scheduler_ops scheduler_fo_ops = {
> +	slave_attach,
> +	slave_detach,
> +	scheduler_start,
> +	scheduler_stop,
> +	scheduler_config_qp,
> +	scheduler_create_private_ctx,
> +};
> +
> +struct rte_cryptodev_scheduler fo_scheduler = {
> +		.name = "failover-scheduler",
> +		.description = "scheduler which enqueues to the primary slave, "
> +				"and only then enqueues to the secondary slave "
> +				"upon failing on enqueuing to primary",
> +		.mode = CDEV_SCHED_MODE_FAILOVER,
> +		.ops = &scheduler_fo_ops
> +};
> +
> +struct rte_cryptodev_scheduler *failover_scheduler = &fo_scheduler;
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-28 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 13:02 [PATCH v2 0/3] crypto/scheduler: add fail-over mode Fan Zhang
2017-03-23 13:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] crypto/scheduler: add fail-over scheduling mode file Fan Zhang
2017-03-28 10:57   ` Declan Doherty [this message]
2017-03-23 13:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] crypto/scheduler: enable fail-over scheduling mode Fan Zhang
2017-03-23 13:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] doc: update cryptodev scheduler PMD documentation Fan Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3addd0f7-c047-ded4-d848-345d870530c6@intel.com \
    --to=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.