From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEE9C433E3 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0584F2067C for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726646AbgHRIcY (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:32:24 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0109.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.109]:35686 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726043AbgHRIcT (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:32:19 -0400 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E4E18029129; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:32:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: brick48_020b1d72701d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2975 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.133.149]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <3ae89ad82dca2cf0adeba9d7d07f3c76ce577c39.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib/string.c: implement stpcpy From: Joe Perches To: David Laight , 'Nick Desaulniers' , Sami Tolvanen , Arvind Sankar , Kees Cook Cc: Sedat Dilek , Fangrui Song , Andrew Morton , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E1vid_Bolvansk=FD?= , Eli Friedman , "# 3.4.x" , Vishal Verma , Dan Williams , Andy Shevchenko , "Joel Fernandes (Google)" , Daniel Axtens , Ingo Molnar , Yury Norov , Alexandru Ardelean , LKML , clang-built-linux , Rasmus Villemoes , Nathan Chancellor Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:32:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: <77557c29286140dea726cc334b4f59fc@AcuMS.aculab.com> References: <20200815014006.GB99152@rani.riverdale.lan> <20200815020946.1538085-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <202008150921.B70721A359@keescook> <457a91183581509abfa00575d0392be543acbe07.camel@perches.com> <20200816001917.4krsnrik7hxxfqfm@google.com> <20200816150217.GA1306483@rani.riverdale.lan> <77557c29286140dea726cc334b4f59fc@AcuMS.aculab.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 08:24 +0000, David Laight wrote: > From: Nick Desaulniers > > Sent: 17 August 2020 19:37 > .. > > That said, this libcall optimization/transformation (sprintf->stpcpy) > > does look useful to me. > > I'd rather get a cow if I ask for a cow... > > Maybe checkpatch (etc) could report places where snprintf() > could be replaced by a simpler function. You mean sprintf no? Reminds me of seq_printf vs seq_puts... https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/16/79