From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A295CC4363A for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ABEB22263 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:49:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9ABEB22263 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-267-gc7FzOjSNvyrfxc3Cpi-xg-1; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:49:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gc7FzOjSNvyrfxc3Cpi-xg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B6255720C; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAEA610013D0; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EF192F2E; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 09QBiD0N018033 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:44:14 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 87AA0110FBFE; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast04.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B71110FBFC for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42CAE102F1E1 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-151-DcQzfVZPPvaF-LrJ0IV9UA-1; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:44:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DcQzfVZPPvaF-LrJ0IV9UA-1 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CKXzp4hDVzLp3f; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:44:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.178.210] (10.174.178.210) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:43:51 +0800 To: Martin Wilck , Christophe Varoqui , Benjamin Marzinski , dm-devel mailing list References: <2a95503c-da40-391c-ce76-bdde19636b51@huawei.com> <6b99062343bcbf097421d5a3f12b96ebe32cdcb8.camel@suse.com> From: lixiaokeng Message-ID: <3b310e1e-9e28-2d2c-a275-9247ed542141@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:43:51 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6b99062343bcbf097421d5a3f12b96ebe32cdcb8.camel@suse.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.210] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.3 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: linfeilong , "liuzhiqiang \(I\)" Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/6] multipath-tools history bug in 0.4.9 X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Thanks for the patches, but unless you can provide evidence that the > issues are still present in recent upstream code, we likely won't > bother with this on dm-devel. Please report this to the distribution(s) > you are using that are still shipping the old multipath-tools versions. > > Regards, > Martin > Hi Martin. Thanks for your reply. I'm sorry for sending these old patches. Before these patches, I sent two patch "libmultipath: fix memory leaks in coalesce_paths" (v2) and "libmultipath: call udev_device_unref before return". But I did not get a reply. Do you notice them? Regards, Martin -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel