On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 15:22 +0000, Fuchs, Andreas wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> are you sure this is about the (default) parent, i.e. primary key ?
> 
> I assume you're talking about the actual key, which I left out for
> the specification.
> Can this be ?

James's code uses the 'parent' handle from the ASN.1 directly if it
matches 0x81xxxxxx. If it doesn't, then he has a function equivalent to
your init_tpm_primary() function, except that the value used for
in.primaryHandle is the one from the ASN.1. Which seems like it's
designed to allow the user of other hierarchies. It defaults to
RH_OWNER, while yours is hard-coded to that.

But I see James is awake now, so I'll defer to him...