From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]:32876 "EHLO mail-qt0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750940AbdBKVpR (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:45:17 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id v23so60844642qtb.0 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 13:45:17 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC] backports: always use new version compare macros To: Johannes Berg , backports@vger.kernel.org References: <20170207220716.7538-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <1486505323.18071.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: Arend Van Spriel Message-ID: <3babafe1-f754-bfe0-06fd-94e69137520a@broadcom.com> (sfid-20170211_224522_079060_18C1C789) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 22:45:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1486505323.18071.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 7-2-2017 23:08, Johannes Berg wrote: > It's some churn, but I think worthwhile - any objections? I find comparison operators more clear, but it is probably just a matter of getting used to it. What makes it worthwile? As you already did the churn I do not have any objections. Just curious. Regards, Arend > johannes > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in