From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgK5-00062j-Ew for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:45:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgK4-0007s1-MV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:45:57 -0400 References: <20170628175534.14295-1-eblake@redhat.com> <4e6a11e8-d2f9-faa0-8203-9421c79224f3@virtuozzo.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: <3bad6d40-172c-3061-fad2-7033372ecbf8@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:45:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/11] make dirty-bitmap byte-based List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Paolo Bonzini On 06/29/2017 11:11 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/29/2017 03:28 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Can we apply my "[PATCH v22 00/30] qcow2: persistent dirty bitmaps" >> first? It was already near to the victory a week ago, but I had to >> rebase it on new Paolo's patches. > > Sure, I can rebase on top of yours (I've already rebased multiple times, > as have you, but yours has been on the list longer). > I would normally like to feign impartiality, but in this case I'd really prefer if Vladimir's patches went through first, too. --js