From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HK_RANDOM_FROM,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0102C43331 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84BE420789 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:11:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 84BE420789 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CFA898EE; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BDBA898EE for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:11:13 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: gpYSSF6WtAvm883fL6Dz1xgEjT5KR2HJm9MV0zgofiIPuGf2kOFZieqrG4cjDBoXefyq8vUcy3 yVaBMnw6RW1Q== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2020 09:11:13 -0700 IronPort-SDR: T8KYAr2NkpGc9qj1/PmLomjiEiO6s/2S6px07YDCiLcKAtfvdMu5PIdUv8heMOvkOmH5jU/9q6 qR9+d6BwbAUQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,301,1580803200"; d="scan'208";a="419944353" Received: from preuss-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.56.19]) ([10.252.56.19]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2020 09:11:11 -0700 To: Chris Wilson , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20200324120718.977-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> From: Tvrtko Ursulin Organization: Intel Corporation UK Plc Message-ID: <3bcb551d-2c11-6dbd-cc4b-b60c9a79f6b1@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:11:10 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200324120718.977-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/execlists: Pull tasklet interrupt-bh local to direct submission X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 24/03/2020 12:07, Chris Wilson wrote: > We dropped calling process_csb prior to handling direct submission in > order to avoid the nesting of spinlocks and lift process_csb() and the > majority of the tasklet out of irq-off. However, we do want to avoid > ksoftirqd latency in the fast path, so try and pull the interrupt-bh > local to direct submission if we can acquire the tasklet's lock. Oh and important question - who benefits and how much? Regards, Tvrtko > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c > index 210f60e14ef4..82dee2141b46 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c > @@ -2891,6 +2891,12 @@ static void __submit_queue_imm(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) > if (reset_in_progress(execlists)) > return; /* defer until we restart the engine following reset */ > > + /* Hopefully we clear execlists->pending[] to let us through */ > + if (execlists->pending[0] && tasklet_trylock(&execlists->tasklet)) { > + process_csb(engine); > + tasklet_unlock(&execlists->tasklet); > + } > + > __execlists_submission_tasklet(engine); > } > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx