From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daz3i-0003Qi-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 02:47:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daz3e-00075r-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 02:47:38 -0400 References: <20170728053610.15770-1-f4bug@amsat.org> <20170728053610.15770-2-f4bug@amsat.org> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <3be12552-daf6-450f-765e-ce390c4bf3c6@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:47:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170728053610.15770-2-f4bug@amsat.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/47] MAINTAINERS: add missing entry for documentation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 28.07.2017 07:35, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 > --- >=20 > because having only a "Build system architecture" entry in Documentatio= n seems > odd to me, so RFC. >=20 > MAINTAINERS | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >=20 > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 5ea273f899..972118e70b 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -1886,6 +1886,9 @@ W: http://patchew.org/QEMU/ > =20 > Documentation > ------------- > +Overall > +F: docs/ But it also does not make sense to add such an entry without a "M:" line, does it? Thomas