From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>, "dianders@chromium.org" <dianders@chromium.org>, Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>, Ding Zhao Nan <oshack@hotmail.com>, "evgreen@chromium.org" <evgreen@chromium.org>, "kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>, "johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>, "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>, "kvalo@codeaurora.org" <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets in thread Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:10:15 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <3ce69fb9-f340-d50d-8e77-61c7210a61c6@nbd.name> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200726012244.15264-1-hdanton@sina.com> On 2020-07-26 03:22, Hillf Danton wrote: >> - add a state bit for threaded NAPI >> - make netif_threaded_napi_add inline >> - run queue_work outside of local_irq_save/restore (it does that >> internally already) >> >> If you don't mind, I'd like to propose this to netdev soon. Can I have >> your Signed-off-by for that? > > Feel free to do that. Is it likely for me to select a Cc? Shall I use Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>? What Cc do you want me to add? >> --- >> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h >> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h >> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ struct napi_struct { >> struct list_head dev_list; >> struct hlist_node napi_hash_node; >> unsigned int napi_id; >> + struct work_struct work; >> }; >> >> enum { >> @@ -357,6 +358,7 @@ enum { >> NAPI_STATE_HASHED, /* In NAPI hash (busy polling possible) */ >> NAPI_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL,/* Do not add in napi_hash, no busy polling */ >> NAPI_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL,/* sk_busy_loop() owns this NAPI */ >> + NAPI_STATE_THREADED, /* Use threaded NAPI */ >> }; >> >> enum { >> @@ -367,6 +369,7 @@ enum { >> NAPIF_STATE_HASHED = BIT(NAPI_STATE_HASHED), >> NAPIF_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL = BIT(NAPI_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL), >> NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL = BIT(NAPI_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL), >> + NAPIF_STATE_THREADED = BIT(NAPI_STATE_THREADED), >> }; >> >> enum gro_result { >> @@ -2315,6 +2318,26 @@ static inline void *netdev_priv(const struct net_device *dev) >> void netif_napi_add(struct net_device *dev, struct napi_struct *napi, >> int (*poll)(struct napi_struct *, int), int weight); >> >> +/** >> + * netif_threaded_napi_add - initialize a NAPI context >> + * @dev: network device >> + * @napi: NAPI context >> + * @poll: polling function >> + * @weight: default weight >> + * >> + * This variant of netif_napi_add() should be used from drivers using NAPI >> + * with CPU intensive poll functions. >> + * This will schedule polling from a high priority workqueue that >> + */ >> +static inline void netif_threaded_napi_add(struct net_device *dev, >> + struct napi_struct *napi, >> + int (*poll)(struct napi_struct *, int), >> + int weight) >> +{ >> + set_bit(NAPI_STATE_THREADED, &napi->state); >> + netif_napi_add(dev, napi, poll, weight); >> +} >> + >> /** >> * netif_tx_napi_add - initialize a NAPI context >> * @dev: network device >> --- a/net/core/dev.c >> +++ b/net/core/dev.c >> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(offload_lock); >> struct list_head ptype_base[PTYPE_HASH_SIZE] __read_mostly; >> struct list_head ptype_all __read_mostly; /* Taps */ >> static struct list_head offload_base __read_mostly; >> +static struct workqueue_struct *napi_workq; > > Is __read_mostly missing? Yes, thanks. I will add that before sending the patch. - Felix
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name> To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Ding Zhao Nan <oshack@hotmail.com>, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>, "dianders@chromium.org" <dianders@chromium.org>, David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>, Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>, "evgreen@chromium.org" <evgreen@chromium.org>, "kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>, Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>, "johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>, "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>, "kvalo@codeaurora.org" <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets in thread Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:10:15 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <3ce69fb9-f340-d50d-8e77-61c7210a61c6@nbd.name> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200726012244.15264-1-hdanton@sina.com> On 2020-07-26 03:22, Hillf Danton wrote: >> - add a state bit for threaded NAPI >> - make netif_threaded_napi_add inline >> - run queue_work outside of local_irq_save/restore (it does that >> internally already) >> >> If you don't mind, I'd like to propose this to netdev soon. Can I have >> your Signed-off-by for that? > > Feel free to do that. Is it likely for me to select a Cc? Shall I use Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>? What Cc do you want me to add? >> --- >> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h >> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h >> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ struct napi_struct { >> struct list_head dev_list; >> struct hlist_node napi_hash_node; >> unsigned int napi_id; >> + struct work_struct work; >> }; >> >> enum { >> @@ -357,6 +358,7 @@ enum { >> NAPI_STATE_HASHED, /* In NAPI hash (busy polling possible) */ >> NAPI_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL,/* Do not add in napi_hash, no busy polling */ >> NAPI_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL,/* sk_busy_loop() owns this NAPI */ >> + NAPI_STATE_THREADED, /* Use threaded NAPI */ >> }; >> >> enum { >> @@ -367,6 +369,7 @@ enum { >> NAPIF_STATE_HASHED = BIT(NAPI_STATE_HASHED), >> NAPIF_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL = BIT(NAPI_STATE_NO_BUSY_POLL), >> NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL = BIT(NAPI_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL), >> + NAPIF_STATE_THREADED = BIT(NAPI_STATE_THREADED), >> }; >> >> enum gro_result { >> @@ -2315,6 +2318,26 @@ static inline void *netdev_priv(const struct net_device *dev) >> void netif_napi_add(struct net_device *dev, struct napi_struct *napi, >> int (*poll)(struct napi_struct *, int), int weight); >> >> +/** >> + * netif_threaded_napi_add - initialize a NAPI context >> + * @dev: network device >> + * @napi: NAPI context >> + * @poll: polling function >> + * @weight: default weight >> + * >> + * This variant of netif_napi_add() should be used from drivers using NAPI >> + * with CPU intensive poll functions. >> + * This will schedule polling from a high priority workqueue that >> + */ >> +static inline void netif_threaded_napi_add(struct net_device *dev, >> + struct napi_struct *napi, >> + int (*poll)(struct napi_struct *, int), >> + int weight) >> +{ >> + set_bit(NAPI_STATE_THREADED, &napi->state); >> + netif_napi_add(dev, napi, poll, weight); >> +} >> + >> /** >> * netif_tx_napi_add - initialize a NAPI context >> * @dev: network device >> --- a/net/core/dev.c >> +++ b/net/core/dev.c >> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(offload_lock); >> struct list_head ptype_base[PTYPE_HASH_SIZE] __read_mostly; >> struct list_head ptype_all __read_mostly; /* Taps */ >> static struct list_head offload_base __read_mostly; >> +static struct workqueue_struct *napi_workq; > > Is __read_mostly missing? Yes, thanks. I will add that before sending the patch. - Felix _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-26 8:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-07-21 17:14 Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 1/7] mac80211: Add check for napi handle before WARN_ON Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-22 12:56 ` Johannes Berg 2020-07-22 12:56 ` Johannes Berg 2020-07-23 18:26 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-23 18:26 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-23 20:06 ` Johannes Berg 2020-07-23 20:06 ` Johannes Berg 2020-07-24 6:21 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-24 6:21 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-26 16:19 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-26 16:19 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-30 12:40 ` Johannes Berg 2020-07-30 12:40 ` Johannes Berg 2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 21:53 ` Rajkumar Manoharan 2020-07-21 21:53 ` Rajkumar Manoharan 2020-07-22 12:27 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-22 12:27 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-22 12:55 ` Johannes Berg 2020-07-22 12:55 ` Johannes Berg 2020-07-22 13:00 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-22 13:00 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-23 6:09 ` Rajkumar Manoharan 2020-07-23 6:09 ` Rajkumar Manoharan 2021-03-22 23:57 ` Ben Greear 2021-03-22 23:57 ` Ben Greear 2021-03-23 1:20 ` Brian Norris 2021-03-23 1:20 ` Brian Norris 2021-03-23 3:01 ` Ben Greear 2021-03-23 3:01 ` Ben Greear 2021-03-23 7:45 ` Felix Fietkau 2021-03-23 7:45 ` Felix Fietkau 2021-03-25 9:45 ` Rakesh Pillai 2021-03-25 9:45 ` Rakesh Pillai 2021-03-25 10:33 ` Felix Fietkau 2021-03-25 10:33 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-23 18:25 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-23 18:25 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-24 23:11 ` Jacob Keller 2020-07-24 23:11 ` Jacob Keller 2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 3/7] ath10k: Add module param to enable rx thread Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 4/7] ath10k: Do not exhaust budget on process tx completion Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 5/7] ath10k: Handle the rx packet processing in thread Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 6/7] ath10k: Add deliver to stack from thread context Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 7/7] ath10k: Handle rx thread suspend and resume Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-23 23:06 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2020-07-23 23:06 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2020-07-24 6:19 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-24 6:19 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-21 17:25 ` [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets in thread Andrew Lunn 2020-07-21 17:25 ` Andrew Lunn 2020-07-21 18:05 ` Florian Fainelli 2020-07-21 18:05 ` Florian Fainelli 2020-07-23 18:21 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-23 18:21 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-23 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli 2020-07-23 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli 2020-07-24 6:20 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-24 6:20 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-24 22:28 ` Florian Fainelli 2020-07-24 22:28 ` Florian Fainelli 2020-07-22 9:12 ` David Laight 2020-07-22 9:12 ` David Laight 2020-07-25 8:16 ` Hillf Danton 2020-07-25 10:38 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2020-07-25 10:38 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2020-07-25 12:25 ` Hillf Danton 2020-07-25 14:08 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2020-07-25 14:08 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2020-07-25 14:57 ` Hillf Danton 2020-07-25 15:41 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2020-07-25 15:41 ` Sebastian Gottschall 2020-07-26 11:16 ` David Laight 2020-07-26 11:16 ` David Laight 2020-07-28 16:59 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-28 16:59 ` Rakesh Pillai 2020-07-29 1:34 ` Hillf Danton 2020-07-25 17:57 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-25 17:57 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-26 1:22 ` Hillf Danton 2020-07-26 8:10 ` Felix Fietkau [this message] 2020-07-26 8:10 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-26 8:32 ` Hillf Danton 2020-07-26 8:59 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-26 8:59 ` Felix Fietkau 2020-07-22 16:20 ` Jakub Kicinski 2020-07-22 16:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=3ce69fb9-f340-d50d-8e77-61c7210a61c6@nbd.name \ --to=nbd@nbd.name \ --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \ --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \ --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \ --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=dianders@chromium.org \ --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \ --cc=hdanton@sina.com \ --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=oshack@hotmail.com \ --cc=pillair@codeaurora.org \ --subject='Re: [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets in thread' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.