From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1frh2d-0005ed-6o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 06:04:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1frgxy-0004Og-Mf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 05:59:22 -0400 References: <20180818025600.21132-1-f4bug@amsat.org> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: <3ce9ffc8-1902-8531-c19f-961a9d497e67@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:59:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180818025600.21132-1-f4bug@amsat.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sheepdog: Replace strncpy() by g_strlcpy() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Howard Spoelstra , Hitoshi Mitake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Liu Yuan , Jeff Cody , Kevin Wolf , Max Reitz , "open list:Sheepdog" , "open list:Sheepdog" On 18.08.2018 04:56, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > Fedora 29 comes with GCC 8.1 which added the 'stringop-truncation' chec= ks. >=20 > Replace the strncpy() calls by g_strlcpy() to avoid the following warni= ng: >=20 > block/sheepdog.c: In function 'find_vdi_name': > block/sheepdog.c:1239:5: error: 'strncpy' specified bound 256 equals > destination size [-Werror=3Dstringop-truncation] > strncpy(buf + SD_MAX_VDI_LEN, tag, SD_MAX_VDI_TAG_LEN); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >=20 > Reported-by: Howard Spoelstra > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 > --- > See http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-07/msg03723.ht= ml >=20 > block/sheepdog.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c > index b229a664d9..5dc3d0c39e 100644 > --- a/block/sheepdog.c > +++ b/block/sheepdog.c > @@ -1224,19 +1224,19 @@ static int find_vdi_name(BDRVSheepdogState *s, = const char *filename, > SheepdogVdiReq hdr; > SheepdogVdiRsp *rsp =3D (SheepdogVdiRsp *)&hdr; > unsigned int wlen, rlen =3D 0; > - char buf[SD_MAX_VDI_LEN + SD_MAX_VDI_TAG_LEN]; > + /* Ensures that the buffer is zero-filled, > + * which is desirable since we'll soon be sending those bytes, and > + * don't want the send_req to read uninitialized data. > + */ I this really necessary? The two g_strlcpy should still fill the whole buffer, no? > + char buf[SD_MAX_VDI_LEN + SD_MAX_VDI_TAG_LEN] =3D { }; > =20 > fd =3D connect_to_sdog(s, errp); > if (fd < 0) { > return fd; > } > =20 > - /* This pair of strncpy calls ensures that the buffer is zero-fill= ed, > - * which is desirable since we'll soon be sending those bytes, and > - * don't want the send_req to read uninitialized data. > - */ > - strncpy(buf, filename, SD_MAX_VDI_LEN); > - strncpy(buf + SD_MAX_VDI_LEN, tag, SD_MAX_VDI_TAG_LEN); > + g_strlcpy(buf, filename, SD_MAX_VDI_LEN); > + g_strlcpy(buf + SD_MAX_VDI_LEN, tag, SD_MAX_VDI_TAG_LEN); > =20 > memset(&hdr, 0, sizeof(hdr)); > if (lock) { >=20 --=20 Thanks, David / dhildenb