Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390x: Increase architectural compliance

[Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1263 bytes --]

On 12/2/19 9:57 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:20:22 -0500
> Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> On a diag 308 subcode 0 and 1 we need to load the whole reset PSW and
>> not just the address.
>>
>> On a cpu reset normal, we need to clear local cpus. Unfortunately we
>> need a new API for that, since KVM only exposes one of the three
>> resets.
>>
>> Patches are also in my cleanup branch.
>>
>> Janosch Frank (3):
>>   s390x: Properly fetch and test the short psw on diag308 subc 0/1
>>   Sync reset
>>   s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions
>>
>>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h |  7 +++++++
>>  target/s390x/cpu.c        | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  target/s390x/cpu.h        |  1 +
>>  target/s390x/kvm-stub.c   | 10 +++++++++-
>>  target/s390x/kvm.c        | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>  target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h  |  4 +++-
>>  6 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Ok, it seems I should just go ahead and pick patch 1, and defer the
> remainder until after we agree on the interface, right?
> 

Yes. I'm currently reworking and testing the reset patch and there's one
more patch that'll come into this series, as I found another problem.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]