From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965851AbXBTBAQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:00:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965854AbXBTBAQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:00:16 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]:20433 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965851AbXBTBAN (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:00:13 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZttBBnls1c7064SP9bj5bmTBdL9pM11Tkcueb0H1TMpUZlDAUE6A9lTd5ptGyc+v8zdUYjPsDz7gS78t5kaBKPuov0yKeY7Eo2GRhMEb7smK8Rsp0FLib8tUlORxyYHv46WpE4g8UBDEJx/vEdoP6Y0k1rH+C5gUO22ySbimpis= Message-ID: <3d57814d0702191700w22378187w20ef928a896ab148@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:00:11 +1000 From: "Trent Waddington" To: "Michael K. Edwards" Subject: Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers Cc: davids@webmaster.com, "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , "Neil Brown" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3d57814d0702171726l403c7812n19f2a226cba02e5d@mail.gmail.com> <3d57814d0702191426m2fc3c1c6had125a2db165befe@mail.gmail.com> <3d57814d0702191458l1021caeyaefd7775398c5f2a@mail.gmail.com> <3d57814d0702191526r5f594374t50a0203d2dc6d36e@mail.gmail.com> <3d57814d0702191636q3a9f96a2xc029ea92a27a3748@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/20/07, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > And for those reading along at home, _surely_ you understand the > meanings of "ambiguities in an offer of contract must be construed > against the offeror", "'derivative work' and 'license' are terms of > art in copyright law", and "not a valid limitation of scope". If not, > I highly recommend to you that master of exposition who goes by "Op. > Cit.". You're really not helping yourself in making a convincing argument here. Trent