From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99B75C19F2A for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.380593.614809 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJdr0-0007kV-9s; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:37:46 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 380593.614809; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:37:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJdr0-0007kO-5Z; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:37:46 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 380593; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:37:45 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJdqy-0007k2-UN for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:37:45 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJdqu-0000FB-J7; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:37:40 +0000 Received: from [54.239.6.184] (helo=[10.7.237.15]) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJdqu-00007O-DZ; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 16:37:40 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: References:Cc:To:From:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID; bh=YwuaDAU6VG1V9chyav9nqirlmVG4W6sb+NsRClJZqoU=; b=to1wSfGz+h2Og+sHmDFdOCqSCw +EK0bX8KSw8KNXitW0NmYdg4t1DALAoy7t0hEsdYm9hGRWtFsJDPK4iO2DLnoiGyiOp6iP86jW1fg YOdXN1ixyvuZ5c1K853o9d1PJUkDbNY1aQeOWfUNm7AwM+P5q8zC9456M134IGEqESKo=; Message-ID: <3df9ef1c-b707-7d14-204f-73d55b237cee@xen.org> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:37:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.0 Subject: Re: [xen-unstable-smoke bisection] complete build-amd64-libvirt Content-Language: en-US From: Julien Grall To: Andrew Cooper , Jan Beulich Cc: osstest service owner , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Oleksandr Tyshchenko , Anthony Perard , "committers@xenproject.org" References: <08606914-f5f4-8415-51a2-f6a5e1c54d20@suse.com> <7bcf8fac-df56-2032-0057-2b7c671e59be@suse.com> <16b1c490-1d8f-1c35-496a-a60fb1404fc3@xen.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, On 02/08/2022 11:58, Julien Grall wrote: > On 01/08/2022 14:15, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> The testing situation with libvirt is already bad.  I don't think a >> force push is going to make it meaningfully worse. > > I have forced pushed to the branch smoke using the flight 171899. For > staging, it looks like the latest flight was testing f732240f, so we > don't have one with the libvirt patches. > > I am hoping the push to the smoke branch will trigger a xen-unstable > flight. master has now been forced push as well. Cheers, -- Julien Grall