From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in
 generic_make_request()
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 11:33:21 -0300
Message-ID: <3e583b2d-742a-3238-69ed-7a2e6cce417b@canonical.com>
References: <20190520220911.25192-1-gpiccoli@canonical.com>
 <CAPhsuW6KayaNR-0eFHpvPG-LVuPFL_1OFjvZpOcnapVFe2vC9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW6KayaNR-0eFHpvPG-LVuPFL_1OFjvZpOcnapVFe2vC9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, Gavin Guo <gavin.guo@canonical.com>, Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>, "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <kernel@gpiccoli.net>, stable@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com>, hch@infradead.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On 21/05/2019 02:59, Song Liu wrote:
> 
> Applied both patches! Thanks for the fix!

Hi Song, sorry for the annoyance, but the situation of both patches is a
bit confused for me heheh

You mention you've applied both patches - I couldn't find your tree.
Also, Christoph noticed Ming's series fixes both issues and suggested to
drop both my patches in favor of Ming's clean-up, or at least make them
-stable only.

So, what is the current status of the patches? Can we have them on
-stable trees at least? If so, how should I proceed?

Thanks in advance for the clarification!
Cheers,


Guilherme