All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wesley Cheng <wcheng@codeaurora.org>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
	"balbi@kernel.org" <balbi@kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jackp@codeauora.org" <jackp@codeauora.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] usb: dwc3: usb: dwc3: Force stop EP0 transfers during pullup disable
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:12:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3edf74ba-d167-0589-a7ab-827b57aa5d9c@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bcc8ff30-5c49-bddd-2f61-05da859b2647@synopsys.com>

Hi Thinh,

On 8/11/2021 5:47 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> Wesley Cheng wrote:
>> During a USB cable disconnect, or soft disconnect scenario, a pending
>> SETUP transaction may not be completed, leading to the following
>> error:
>>
>>     dwc3 a600000.dwc3: timed out waiting for SETUP phase
> 
> How could it be a case of cable disconnect? The pullup(0) only applies
> for soft-disconnect scenario. If the device initiated a disconnect, then

Thanks for the response.  I guess this is specific for some use cases,
but some applications such as ADB will close the FFS EP files after it
gets the disconnection event, leading to this pullup disable as well.
So its specific to that particular use case.

> the driver should wait for the control request to complete. If it times
> out, something is already wrong here. The programming guide only
> mentions that we should wait for completion, but it doesn't say about
> recovery in a case of hung transfer. I need to check internally but it
> should be safe to issue End Transfer.
> 

Yes, what I did was modify a device running the Linux XHCI stack w/o
reading/sending out the SETUP DATA phase, so that on the device end we'd
always run into that situation where there's still a pending EP0 TRB queued.

We're running multiple devices with this fix as well, and doing device
initiated disconnect.

>>
>> If this occurs, then the entire pullup disable routine is skipped and
>> proper cleanup and halting of the controller does not complete.
>> Instead of returning an error (which is ignored from the UDC
>> perspective), do what is mentioned in the comments and force the
>> transaction to complete and put the ep0state back to the SETUP phase.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <wcheng@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c    | 4 ++--
>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 6 +++++-
>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h | 3 +++
>>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
>> index 6587394..abfc42b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ int dwc3_gadget_ep0_queue(struct usb_ep *ep, struct usb_request *request,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void dwc3_ep0_stall_and_restart(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>> +void dwc3_ep0_stall_and_restart(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>>  {
>>  	struct dwc3_ep		*dep;
>>  
>> @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ void dwc3_ep0_send_delayed_status(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>>  	__dwc3_ep0_do_control_status(dwc, dwc->eps[direction]);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void dwc3_ep0_end_control_data(struct dwc3 *dwc, struct dwc3_ep *dep)
>> +void dwc3_ep0_end_control_data(struct dwc3 *dwc, struct dwc3_ep *dep)
>>  {
>>  	struct dwc3_gadget_ep_cmd_params params;
>>  	u32			cmd;
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> index 54c5a08..a0e2e4d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> @@ -2437,7 +2437,11 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_pullup(struct usb_gadget *g, int is_on)
>>  				msecs_to_jiffies(DWC3_PULL_UP_TIMEOUT));
>>  		if (ret == 0) {
>>  			dev_err(dwc->dev, "timed out waiting for SETUP phase\n");
>> -			return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> +			spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
>> +			dwc3_ep0_end_control_data(dwc, dwc->eps[0]);
>> +			dwc3_ep0_end_control_data(dwc, dwc->eps[1]);
> 
> End transfer command takes time, need to wait for it to complete before
> issuing Start transfer again. Also, why restart again when it's about to
> be disconnected.

I can try without restarting it again, and see if that works.  Instead
of waiting for the command complete event, can we set the ForceRM bit,
similar to what we do for dwc3_remove_requests()?

> 
> We'd also need to watch out for soft-connect in quick succession before
> the End Transfer command completes.
> 
>> +			dwc3_ep0_stall_and_restart(dwc);
>> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h
>> index 77df4b6..632f7b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h
>> @@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ int __dwc3_gadget_ep0_set_halt(struct usb_ep *ep, int value);
>>  int dwc3_gadget_ep0_set_halt(struct usb_ep *ep, int value);
>>  int dwc3_gadget_ep0_queue(struct usb_ep *ep, struct usb_request *request,
>>  		gfp_t gfp_flags);
>> +void dwc3_ep0_stall_and_restart(struct dwc3 *dwc);
>> +void dwc3_ep0_end_control_data(struct dwc3 *dwc, struct dwc3_ep *dep);
>> +
>>  int __dwc3_gadget_ep_set_halt(struct dwc3_ep *dep, int value, int protocol);
>>  void dwc3_ep0_send_delayed_status(struct dwc3 *dwc);
>>  
>>
> 
> BR,
> Thinh
> 

Thanks
Wesley Cheng

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-12 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-11  2:23 [RFC][PATCH] usb: dwc3: usb: dwc3: Force stop EP0 transfers during pullup disable Wesley Cheng
2021-08-12  0:47 ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-08-12 17:12   ` Wesley Cheng [this message]
2021-08-12 21:31     ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-08-12 23:19       ` Wesley Cheng
2021-08-13 23:21         ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-08-13 23:49           ` Wesley Cheng
2021-08-14  0:30             ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-08-15  0:26               ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-08-15  6:06                 ` Felipe Balbi
2021-08-16  0:33                   ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-08-16  5:15                     ` Felipe Balbi
2021-08-17  1:25                       ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-08-16 19:13                     ` Wesley Cheng
2021-08-18 21:24                       ` Wesley Cheng
2021-08-19  0:40                         ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-08-19 20:51                           ` Wesley Cheng
2021-08-20  1:52                             ` Thinh Nguyen
2021-08-20  3:05                               ` Wesley Cheng
2021-08-19  5:36                         ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3edf74ba-d167-0589-a7ab-827b57aa5d9c@codeaurora.org \
    --to=wcheng@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jackp@codeauora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.