From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sandeen.net ([63.231.237.45]:54264 "EHLO sandeen.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731863AbeGaAVq (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2018 20:21:46 -0400 Subject: Re: Clearly state infrastructure change on old XFS website References: <4b3ef7f54f32dc2b61a5d4a33a0e5b2e@wh2.tu-dresden.de> <20180730223042.GC4226@magnolia> From: Eric Sandeen Message-ID: <3f708cdb-4cb0-dd12-0483-ada1025364b9@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 17:44:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180730223042.GC4226@magnolia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: "Darrick J. Wong" , adam_kalisz Cc: linux-xfs On 7/30/18 5:30 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:25:40PM +0200, adam_kalisz wrote: >> Dear Darrick, >> >> I wanted to have a look at the recent new features being added to XFS and >> stumbled on the fact, that Google presents me first with the old website [0] >> and starting on page 2 of the web results (for the desperate) with the >> current website [1]. >> >> It would be most helpful to write some notice to the old website and the >> "Getting the latest source code" should point to the current git-repo. It >> cost me some time to realize, there is something wrong, because the git log >> ended at about 4.9 kernel (~2016) when the infrastructure from sgi probably >> got left behind. Also maybe highlight, that the current repo ist xfs-linux >> and NOT linux-xfs! It might help some of your possible future colleagues to >> get started with XFS. > > Sorry about that -- I'll ask those who have write access to xfs.org to > update the links. In the long run I'd rather just move all the > documentation and FAQ into the kernel source itself, especially since it > all now lives on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ ... yeah ... As a general PSA, the wiki is known to be bitrotting. It's impossible to add new editors, for example. It'll eventually probably go away entirely. I've fixed up a couple things Darrick asked me to do, but maybe we should just put a big THIS WIKI IS BITROTTING at the top and be done with it. -Eric > --D > >> TL;DR: >> Please make sure the XFS development is more visible by ensuring that most >> prominent references point to the current repository and website. >>