From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264591AbUANUim (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:38:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264575AbUANUhu (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:37:50 -0500 Received: from smtp.uniroma2.it ([160.80.6.16]:55821 "EHLO mail-gw.uniroma2.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264566AbUANUhj (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:37:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4005A820.3080801@tiscali.it> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:35:44 +0100 From: Mauro Andreolini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031118 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: problems with suspend-to-disk (ACPI), 2.6.1-rc2 References: <3FE5F1110001ED59@mail-4.tiscali.it> <20040113131806.GA343@elf.ucw.cz> <20040113212811.GA12144@gateway.milesteg.arr> <400564AD.6050407@tiscali.it> <1074109633.2189.59.camel@laptop-linux> In-Reply-To: <1074109633.2189.59.camel@laptop-linux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses! Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nigel Cunningham wrote: >Hi. > >I think you'll find that the 'bad: scheduling while atomic' reports are >completely unrelated to whether the drivers works after suspend or not; >they simply reflect that drivers_resume is being called with >preempt_count > 0 (IRQs/preempt not reenabled after copying the image or >fpu not released). > >Regards, > >Nigel > > Thanks for the hint, Nigel. I'll try to take a deeper look into that. Bye Mauro Andreolini