From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E17C4361B for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F4DD23370 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:10:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1F4DD23370 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmFM0-0002jx-1G for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 07:10:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmEgW-0005H8-Oy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:28:05 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmEgJ-0005cT-C6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:28:02 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A9CAD1E; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Why do we have both CONFIG_SOFTMMU and CONFIG_USER_ONLY? To: Paolo Bonzini References: <5176c935-2df0-e300-b1cf-67c7014e5d73@suse.de> <03bdd8fe-53cf-e2d9-cdc8-fd1a22b49941@redhat.com> From: Claudio Fontana Message-ID: <4009cae8-2b88-8a54-48f3-11ae561e6a23@suse.de> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:27:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <03bdd8fe-53cf-e2d9-cdc8-fd1a22b49941@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.135.220.15; envelope-from=cfontana@suse.de; helo=mx2.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 12/7/20 12:26 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 07/12/20 12:19, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> As in Subject, >> >> am I understanding correctly that the one or the other is redundant? >> >> Should we keep only one of them? > > In the code it's not strictly necessary. However in both Makefiles and > meson.build it made/makes things a bit clearer. > > Paolo > K.. thanks a lot, maybe we should document all of this stuff in docs/devel/... Ciao, Claudio