From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Bradner Subject: Re: running out of mount points Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:07:29 -0800 Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Message-ID: <400C2AF1.10309@rhythm.com> References: <4004409C.6040900@sun.com> <40059944.4060901@rhythm.com> <400BFC65.3000700@rhythm.com> <400C0FD2.6000507@sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <400C0FD2.6000507@sun.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: autofs@linux.kernel.org I was hoping there would have been something in the configuration. Right now I use AMD on my mailhost because it understands that it has the server mounted and just links to the mount without creating another mount point. Wouldn't that be more desirable? > Greg Bradner wrote: > >> I wanted to repost this plea. I am really in a bind and could use >> some help. I need to mount these users on the mail server. >> BTW: this is with autofs 4.1.0 >> > This has been discussed various times on this mailing list and is a > known limitation in 2.4 / 2.6. In 2.4, you can patch your kernel > using something similar to: > > http://people.redhat.com/zaitcev/linux/linux-2.4.19-pre7-unmaj.diff > > HTH, >